Giant planet engulfment by evolved giant stars: light curves, asteroseismology, and survivability

AI-generated keywords: Giant Planet Engulfment Evolved Giant Stars Red Giant Branch Asymptotic Giant Branch Asteroseismology

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • About 10% of Sun-like stars will engulf a 1-10 Mj planet during the red giant branch (RGB) or asymptotic giant branch (AGB) phase of their evolution.
  • Engulfed planets spiral inward, depositing energy and angular momentum over a period of approximately 10-100 years.
  • The star responds quasistatically but still brightens measurably on a timescale of years for RGB stars as well as AGB stars with Mp ≤ 5 Mj planets.
  • Asteroseismic indicators such as frequency spacing or rotational splitting differ before and after engulfment.
  • Engulfment events on AGB could be a significant fraction of low-luminosity red novae in the Galaxy based on peak luminosity, color, duration, and expected rate of these events.
  • There are no conditions where the envelope is ejected prior to the planet's tidal disruption, complicating the interpretation of short-period giant planets orbiting white dwarfs as survivors of common-envelope evolution.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Christopher E. O'Connor, Lars Bildsten, Matteo Cantiello, Dong Lai

arXiv: 2304.09882v1 - DOI (astro-ph.EP)
24 pages, 11 figures, 1 table. Submitted to AAS Journals; revised after initial review. Comments welcome

Abstract: About ten percent of Sun-like ($1$-$2 M_\odot$) stars will engulf a $1$-$10 M_{\rm J}$ planet as they expand during the red giant branch (RGB) or asymptotic giant branch (AGB) phase of their evolution. Once engulfed, these planets experience a strong drag force in the star's convective envelope and spiral inward, depositing energy and angular momentum. For these mass ratios, the inspiral takes $\sim 10$-$10^{2}$ years ($\sim 10^{2}$-$10^{3}$ orbits); the planet undergoes tidal disruption at a radius of $\sim R_\odot$. We use the Modules for Experiments in Stellar Astrophysics (MESA) software instrument to track the stellar response to the energy deposition while simultaneously evolving the planetary orbit. For RGB stars, as well as AGB stars with $M_{\rm p} \lesssim 5 M_{\rm J}$ planets, the star responds quasistatically but still brightens measurably on a timescale of years. In addition, asteroseismic indicators, such as the frequency spacing or rotational splitting, differ before and after engulfment. For AGB stars, engulfment of a $M_{\rm p} \gtrsim 5 M_{\rm J}$ planet drives supersonic expansion of the envelope, causing a bright, red, dusty eruption similar to a "luminous red nova." Based on the peak luminosity, color, duration, and expected rate of these events, we suggest that engulfment events on the AGB could be a significant fraction of low-luminosity red novae in the Galaxy. We do not find conditions where the envelope is ejected prior to the planet's tidal disruption, complicating the interpretation of short-period giant planets orbiting white dwarfs as survivors of common-envelope evolution.

Submitted to arXiv on 19 Apr. 2023

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2304.09882v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

In their paper "Giant planet engulfment by evolved giant stars: light curves, asteroseismology, and survivability," Christopher E. O'Connor, Lars Bildsten, Matteo Cantiello, and Dong Lai explore the phenomenon of giant planet engulfment by evolved giant stars. They find that about ten percent of Sun-like ($1$-$2 M_\odot$) stars will engulf a $1$-$10 M_{\rm J}$ planet as they expand during the red giant branch (RGB) or asymptotic giant branch (AGB) phase of their evolution. Once engulfed, these planets experience a strong drag force in the star's convective envelope and spiral inward, depositing energy and angular momentum. The inspiral takes $\sim 10$-$10^{2}$ years ($\sim 10^{2}$-$10^{3}$ orbits), with the planet undergoing tidal disruption at a radius of $\sim R_\odot$. Using the Modules for Experiments in Stellar Astrophysics (MESA) software instrument to track the stellar response to the energy deposition while simultaneously evolving the planetary orbit, they find that for RGB stars as well as AGB stars with $M_{\rm p} \lesssim 5 M_{\rm J}$ planets, the star responds quasistatically but still brightens measurably on a timescale of years. In addition, asteroseismic indicators such as frequency spacing or rotational splitting differ before and after engulfment. Based on peak luminosity, color, duration and expected rate of these events they suggest that engulfment events on AGB could be a significant fraction of low-luminosity red novae in the Galaxy. They do not find conditions where the envelope is ejected prior to the planet's tidal disruption, complicating the interpretation of short-period giant planets orbiting white dwarfs as survivors of common-envelope evolution. Overall, this study sheds light on an intriguing phenomenon that occurs during stellar evolution and provides insights into how it affects both the star and engulfed planet.
Created on 15 May. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.