Neural Architecture Search for Visual Anomaly Segmentation

Authors: Tommie Kerssies

Abstract: This paper presents AutoPatch, the first application of neural architecture search to the complex task of segmenting visual anomalies. Measurement of anomaly segmentation quality is challenging due to imbalanced anomaly pixels, varying region areas, and various types of anomalies. First, the weighted average precision (wAP) metric is proposed as an alternative to AUROC and AUPRO, which does not need to be limited to a specific maximum FPR. Second, a novel neural architecture search method is proposed, which enables efficient segmentation of visual anomalies without any training. By leveraging a pre-trained supernet, a black-box optimization algorithm can directly minimize FLOPS and maximize wAP on a small validation set of anomalous examples. Finally, compelling results on the widely studied MVTec [3] dataset are presented, demonstrating that AutoPatch outperforms the current state-of-the-art method PatchCore [12] with more than 18x fewer FLOPS, using only one example per anomaly type. These results highlight the potential of automated machine learning to optimize throughput in industrial quality control. The code for AutoPatch is available at:

Submitted to arXiv on 18 Apr. 2023

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2304.08975v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

The summary is not ready yet
Created on 28 Apr. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.