Understanding Rug Pulls: An In-Depth Behavioral Analysis of Fraudulent NFT Creators
AI-generated Key Points
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.
- Explosive growth of non-fungible tokens (NFTs) on Web3 has created a new frontier for digital art and collectibles
- NFTs have also opened the door to fraudulent activities such as rug pulls
- Trishie Sharma, Rachit Agarwal, and Sandeep Kumar Shukla conducted an in-depth analysis of NFT rug pulls
- The study examined data from 758 rug pulls across 10 NFT marketplaces to identify the structural and behavioral properties of these schemes as well as the characteristics and motivations of rug-pullers
- Findings revealed that repeated rug pulls account for a significant proportion of the rise in NFT-related cryptocurrency crimes
- One NFT collection attempted 37 rug pulls within three months
- The study identified the largest group of creators influencing most rug pulls and demonstrated how rug-pullers from different NFT projects use the same wallets to store and move money
- Preventative strategies must be designed based on these insights to address this issue going forward
- This research is invaluable given its contribution to understanding NFT market risks as their popularity among investors seeking alternative investment opportunities in digital assets continues to grow.
Authors: Trishie Sharma (Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur, India), Rachit Agarwal (Merkle Science, India), Sandeep Kumar Shukla (Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur, India)
Abstract: The explosive growth of non-fungible tokens (NFTs) on Web3 has created a new frontier for digital art and collectibles, but also an emerging space for fraudulent activities. This study provides an in-depth analysis of NFT rug pulls, which are fraudulent schemes aimed at stealing investors' funds. Using data from 758 rug pulls across 10 NFT marketplaces, we examine the structural and behavioral properties of these schemes, identify the characteristics and motivations of rug-pullers, and classify NFT projects into groups based on creators' association with their accounts. Our findings reveal that repeated rug pulls account for a significant proportion of the rise in NFT-related cryptocurrency crimes, with one NFT collection attempting 37 rug pulls within three months. Additionally, we identify the largest group of creators influencing the majority of rug pulls, and demonstrate the connection between rug-pullers of different NFT projects through the use of the same wallets to store and move money. Our study contributes to the understanding of NFT market risks and provides insights for designing preventative strategies to mitigate future losses.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.
Welcome to our AI assistant! Here are some important things to keep in mind:
- The assistant will only answer questions related to this specific paper.
- Please note that this is not a bot for casual chatting.
- If you want the answer in a language other than the language you chose for navigating the website, simply add "TRANSLATE IN LANGUAGE L" at the end of your query (replace "LANGUAGE L" with the language of your choice).
- For example, you could ask "Can you extract the most important aspect of the paper? TRANSLATE IN SPANISH".
- If you want to keep the history of your questions/answers you should create an account.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through atree representation
Look for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.