Learning by Viewing: Generating Test Inputs for Games by Integrating Human Gameplay Traces in Neuroevolution

AI-generated keywords: Automated Test Generation Neuroevolution Search-Based Software Testing Human Gameplay Traces Gradient Descent

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Automated test generation is common in many programming domains
  • Games present unique challenges due to randomization and hard-to-reach program states
  • Neuroevolution combined with search-based testing has shown promise for testing games
  • Co-evolutionary search for optimal network topologies and weights can take unreasonably long durations
  • Patric Feldmeier and Gordon Fraser propose a novel approach that integrates knowledge about human gameplay behavior into the evolutionary search for networks using traditional gradient descent as a mutation operator
  • Experiments on eight diverse Scratch games show that this approach significantly reduces required search time from five hours to only 52 minutes
  • This paper presents a promising solution to generating automated tests for games, which could improve game development processes.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Patric Feldmeier, Gordon Fraser

Abstract: Although automated test generation is common in many programming domains, games still challenge test generators due to their heavy randomisation and hard-to-reach program states. Neuroevolution combined with search-based software testing principles has been shown to be a promising approach for testing games, but the co-evolutionary search for optimal network topologies and weights involves unreasonably long search durations. In this paper, we aim to improve the evolutionary search for game input generators by integrating knowledge about human gameplay behaviour. To this end, we propose a novel way of systematically recording human gameplay traces, and integrating these traces into the evolutionary search for networks using traditional gradient descent as a mutation operator. Experiments conducted on eight diverse Scratch games demonstrate that the proposed approach reduces the required search time from five hours down to only 52 minutes.

Submitted to arXiv on 13 Apr. 2023

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2304.06413v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

Automated test generation is a common practice in many programming domains. However, games present unique challenges due to their heavy randomization and hard-to-reach program states. Neuroevolution combined with search-based software testing principles has shown promise for testing games but the co-evolutionary search for optimal network topologies and weights can take unreasonably long durations. Patric Feldmeier and Gordon Fraser have proposed a novel approach that integrates knowledge about human gameplay behavior into the evolutionary search for networks using traditional gradient descent as a mutation operator. Experiments conducted on eight diverse Scratch games demonstrate that this approach significantly reduces the required search time from five hours to only 52 minutes. This paper titled "Learning by Viewing: Generating Test Inputs for Games by Integrating Human Gameplay Traces in Neuroevolution" presents a promising solution to the challenge of generating automated tests for games which could have significant implications in improving game development processes.
Created on 17 Apr. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.