## Optimal Asset Allocation in a High Inflation Regime: a Leverage-feasible Neural Network Approach

### AI-generated Key Points

- The paper addresses the optimal multi-period asset allocation problem with leverage constraints in a persistent, high-inflation environment.
- During high-inflation regimes, a portfolio containing an equal-weighted stock index partially stochastically dominates a portfolio containing a capitalization-weighted stock index.
- The authors establish a closed-form solution for the optimal strategy assuming asset prices follow the jump diffusion model during high inflation periods.
- They propose a constrained optimal control problem with bounded leverage and introduce a novel leverage-feasible neural network (LFNN) model that approximates the optimal control directly.
- Numerical experiments show that the LFNN model achieves comparable performance to the closed-form solution on simulated data and consistently outperforms passive benchmark strategies by about 200 bps (median annualized return), with greater than 90% probability of outperforming at terminal date.
- Investors should favor short-term bonds over long-term bonds and equal-weighted stock index over cap-weighted stock index during persistent inflation regimes in a four-asset investment scenario with bootstrap resampled asset returns.
- The proposed LFNN model offers an efficient alternative to traditional dynamic programming approaches and shows promising results in both simulated and real world investment scenarios.

**Authors:**
Chendi Ni,
Yuying Li,
Peter A. Forsyth

**Abstract:** We study the optimal multi-period asset allocation problem with leverage constraints in a persistent, high-inflation environment. Based on filtered high-inflation regimes, we discover that a portfolio containing an equal-weighted stock index partially stochastically dominates a portfolio containing a capitalization-weighted stock index. Assuming the asset prices follow the jump diffusion model during high inflation periods, we establish a closed-form solution for the optimal strategy that outperforms a passive strategy under the cumulative quadratic tracking difference (CD) objective. The closed-form solution provides insights but requires unrealistic constraints. To obtain strategies under more practical considerations, we consider a constrained optimal control problem with bounded leverage. To solve this optimal control problem, we propose a novel leverage-feasible neural network (LFNN) model that approximates the optimal control directly. The LFNN model avoids high-dimensional evaluation of the conditional expectation (common in dynamic programming (DP) approaches). We establish mathematically that the LFNN approximation can yield a solution that is arbitrarily close to the solution of the original optimal control problem with bounded leverage. Numerical experiments show that the LFNN model achieves comparable performance to the closed-form solution on simulated data. We apply the LFNN approach to a four-asset investment scenario with bootstrap resampled asset returns. The LFNN strategy consistently outperforms the passive benchmark strategy by about 200 bps (median annualized return), with a greater than 90% probability of outperforming the benchmark at the terminal date. These results suggest that during persistent inflation regimes, investors should favor short-term bonds over long-term bonds, and the equal-weighted stock index over the cap-weighted stock index.

### Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

**Why do we need votes?**

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

## Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation**Look for similar papers (in beta version)**

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

**Disclaimer:** The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.