If consciousness is dynamically relevant, artificial intelligence isn't conscious
AI-generated Key Points
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.
- Consciousness and artificial intelligence (AI) systems are explored in the paper titled "If consciousness is dynamically relevant, artificial intelligence isn't conscious" by Johannes Kleiner and Tim Ludwig.
- The authors argue that if consciousness affects a system's temporal evolution, AI systems cannot be considered conscious.
- AI systems operate on processors like CPUs, GPUs, and TPUs that adhere to computational dynamics designed to prevent deviations.
- These design and verification processes eliminate potential consciousness-related dynamical effects in AI systems.
- The authors suggest that AI systems lack dynamic relevance, an important aspect of determining consciousness.
- Consequently, the study concludes that AI systems cannot possess consciousness.
- The research highlights the limitations of current AI technologies in replicating human-like consciousness.
- Existing AI technologies fall short compared to humans in terms of conscious awareness.
- The findings contribute to ongoing discussions about the nature of consciousness and its relationship with artificial intelligence.
Authors: Johannes Kleiner, Tim Ludwig
Abstract: We demonstrate that if consciousness is relevant for the temporal evolution of a system's states -- that is, if it is dynamically relevant -- then AI systems cannot be conscious. That is because AI systems run on CPUs, GPUs, TPUs or other processors which have been designed and verified to adhere to computational dynamics that systematically preclude or suppress deviations. The design and verification preclude or suppress, in particular, potential consciousness-related dynamical effects, so that if consciousness is dynamically relevant, AI systems cannot be conscious.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Score: 0
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.