If consciousness is dynamically relevant, artificial intelligence isn't conscious

AI-generated keywords: Consciousness Artificial Intelligence Computational Dynamics Temporal Evolution Human-like

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Consciousness and artificial intelligence (AI) systems are explored in the paper titled "If consciousness is dynamically relevant, artificial intelligence isn't conscious" by Johannes Kleiner and Tim Ludwig.
  • The authors argue that if consciousness affects a system's temporal evolution, AI systems cannot be considered conscious.
  • AI systems operate on processors like CPUs, GPUs, and TPUs that adhere to computational dynamics designed to prevent deviations.
  • These design and verification processes eliminate potential consciousness-related dynamical effects in AI systems.
  • The authors suggest that AI systems lack dynamic relevance, an important aspect of determining consciousness.
  • Consequently, the study concludes that AI systems cannot possess consciousness.
  • The research highlights the limitations of current AI technologies in replicating human-like consciousness.
  • Existing AI technologies fall short compared to humans in terms of conscious awareness.
  • The findings contribute to ongoing discussions about the nature of consciousness and its relationship with artificial intelligence.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Johannes Kleiner, Tim Ludwig

Abstract: We demonstrate that if consciousness is relevant for the temporal evolution of a system's states -- that is, if it is dynamically relevant -- then AI systems cannot be conscious. That is because AI systems run on CPUs, GPUs, TPUs or other processors which have been designed and verified to adhere to computational dynamics that systematically preclude or suppress deviations. The design and verification preclude or suppress, in particular, potential consciousness-related dynamical effects, so that if consciousness is dynamically relevant, AI systems cannot be conscious.

Submitted to arXiv on 11 Apr. 2023

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2304.05077v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

In their paper titled "If consciousness is dynamically relevant, artificial intelligence isn't conscious," authors Johannes Kleiner and Tim Ludwig explore the relationship between consciousness and artificial intelligence (AI) systems. They argue that if consciousness plays a role in the temporal evolution of a system's states, AI systems cannot be considered conscious. The authors highlight that AI systems operate on processors such as CPUs, GPUs, and TPUs which are specifically designed and verified to adhere to computational dynamics that systematically prevent or suppress deviations. These design and verification processes effectively eliminate any potential consciousness-related dynamical effects. By emphasizing the importance of dynamic relevance in determining consciousness, the authors suggest that AI systems lack this crucial aspect due to their predetermined computational dynamics. Consequently, they conclude that AI systems cannot possess consciousness. This study sheds light on the limitations of current AI technologies when it comes to replicating human-like consciousness. It provides insight into how existing AI technologies fall short in comparison to humans when it comes to possessing conscious awareness. The findings contribute to ongoing discussions surrounding the nature of consciousness and its relationship with artificial intelligence by demonstrating how current AI technology fails to meet certain criteria for being considered conscious.
Created on 28 Jun. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.