On the Possibilities of AI-Generated Text Detection

AI-generated keywords: AI-generated text detection

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Distinguishing between outputs generated by Large Language Models (LLMs) and humans is important in numerous applications
  • The possibility and impossibility of such discernment have been subjects of debate within the community
  • It should almost always be possible to detect AI-generated text unless the distributions of human and machine-generated texts are exactly the same over the entire support
  • A precise sample complexity bound for AI-generated text detection tells us how many samples are needed to detect
  • If machine text becomes more like human text, we need more samples to detect it, which gives rise to additional challenges of designing more complicated detectors that take in n samples to detect than just one, which is an area for future research.
  • Empirical evaluations support their claim about the existence of better detectors demonstrating that AI-generated text detection should be achievable in most scenarios.
  • Detecting AI-generated text has significant implications for various applications where trustworthiness is crucial.
  • Continued research in this area is important.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Souradip Chakraborty, Amrit Singh Bedi, Sicheng Zhu, Bang An, Dinesh Manocha, Furong Huang

Abstract: Our work focuses on the challenge of detecting outputs generated by Large Language Models (LLMs) from those generated by humans. The ability to distinguish between the two is of utmost importance in numerous applications. However, the possibility and impossibility of such discernment have been subjects of debate within the community. Therefore, a central question is whether we can detect AI-generated text and, if so, when. In this work, we provide evidence that it should almost always be possible to detect the AI-generated text unless the distributions of human and machine generated texts are exactly the same over the entire support. This observation follows from the standard results in information theory and relies on the fact that if the machine text is becoming more like a human, we need more samples to detect it. We derive a precise sample complexity bound of AI-generated text detection, which tells how many samples are needed to detect. This gives rise to additional challenges of designing more complicated detectors that take in n samples to detect than just one, which is the scope of future research on this topic. Our empirical evaluations support our claim about the existence of better detectors demonstrating that AI-Generated text detection should be achievable in the majority of scenarios. Our results emphasize the importance of continued research in this area

Submitted to arXiv on 10 Apr. 2023

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2304.04736v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

The ability to distinguish between outputs generated by Large Language Models (LLMs) and those generated by humans is of utmost importance in numerous applications. However, the possibility and impossibility of such discernment have been subjects of debate within the community. In their paper titled "On the Possibilities of AI-Generated Text Detection," authors Souradip Chakraborty, Amrit Singh Bedi, Sicheng Zhu, Bang An, Dinesh Manocha, and Furong Huang provide evidence that it should almost always be possible to detect AI-generated text unless the distributions of human and machine-generated texts are exactly the same over the entire support. The authors derive a precise sample complexity bound for AI-generated text detection which tells us how many samples are needed to detect. They observe that if machine text becomes more like human text, we need more samples to detect it. This gives rise to additional challenges of designing more complicated detectors that take in n samples to detect than just one, which is an area for future research. Their empirical evaluations support their claim about the existence of better detectors demonstrating that AI-Generated text detection should be achievable in most scenarios. The authors' results emphasize the importance of continued research in this area as detecting AI-generated text has significant implications for various applications where trustworthiness is crucial. Overall, this paper provides valuable insights into detecting AI-generated text and highlights potential avenues for further research on developing more sophisticated detectors capable of distinguishing between human and machine-generated texts with greater accuracy.
Created on 11 Apr. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.