CCD UBV and Gaia DR3 based analysis of NGC 189, NGC 1758 and NGC 7762 open clusters

AI-generated keywords: Open Clusters CCD UBV Photometry Gaia DR3 Color Excess Galactic Orbit

AI-generated Key Points

  • The paper analyzes three open clusters: NGC 189, NGC 1758, and NGC 7762.
  • CCD UBV photometric and Gaia Data Release 3 (DR3) data were used to identify member stars in each cluster based on membership analyses.
  • Color excesses $E(B-V)$ and photometric metallicities [Fe/H] were determined separately using UBV two-color diagrams.
  • Distance moduli and ages of the clusters were obtained by comparing PARSEC isochrones with color-magnitude diagrams constructed from UBV and Gaia photometric data while keeping constant color excesses and metallicities for each cluster during this process.
  • The estimated isochrone distance is $1201 \pm 53$ pc for NGC 189, $902 \pm33$ pc for NGC 1758, and $911\pm31$ pc for NGC7762 which are compatible with values obtained from trigonometric parallax measurements.
  • The ages of the clusters are 500 Myr $\pm50$, 650 Myr $\pm50$,and 2000 Myr $\pm200$, respectively for
  • NGC189 ,NGC1758 ,andNGC7762.
  • Galactic orbit integration of the clusters was conducted to find that while both
  • NGC189 andNGC7762 enter the solar circle during their orbits;
  • NGC1758 completely orbits outside it.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: T. Yontan, S. Bilir, H. Cakmak, M. Raul, T. Banks, E. Soydugan, R. Canbay, S. Tasdemir

arXiv: 2304.04294v1 - DOI (astro-ph.GA)
25 pages, 11 figures and 6 tables, accepted for publication in Advances in Space Research
License: CC BY 4.0

Abstract: This paper presents photometric, astrometric, and kinematic analyses of the open clusters NGC 189, NGC 1758 and NGC 7762 based on CCD UBV photometric and Gaia Data Release 3 (DR3) data. According to membership analyses, we identified 32, 57 and 106 most probable member stars with membership probabilities $P\geq 0.5$ in NGC 189, NGC 1758 and NGC 7762, respectively. The color excesses and photometric metallicities of each cluster were determined separately using UBV two-color diagrams. The color excess $E(B-V)$ is $0.590 \pm 0.023$ mag for NGC 189, $0.310 \pm 0.022$ mag for NGC 1758 and $0.640 \pm 0.017$ mag for NGC 7762. The photometric metallicity [Fe/H] is $-0.08 \pm 0.03$ dex for both NGC 189 and NGC 1758, and $-0.12 \pm 0.02$ dex for NGC 7762. Distance moduli and ages of the clusters were obtained by comparing PARSEC isochrones with the color-magnitude diagrams constructed from UBV and Gaia photometric data. During this process, we kept as constant color excess and metallicity for each cluster. The estimated isochrone distance is $1201 \pm 53$ pc for NGC 189, $902 \pm 33$ pc for NGC 1758 and $911 \pm 31$ pc for NGC 7762. These are compatible with the values obtained from trigonometric parallax. Ages of the clusters are $500\pm 50$ Myr, $650\pm 50$ Myr and $2000\pm 200$ Myr for NGC 189, NGC 1758 and NGC 7762, respectively. Galactic orbit integration of the clusters showed that NGC 1758 completely orbits outside the solar circle, while NGC 189 and NGC 7762 enter the solar circle during their orbits.

Submitted to arXiv on 09 Apr. 2023

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2304.04294v1

This paper presents a comprehensive analysis of three open clusters, NGC 189, NGC 1758 and NGC 7762. The authors used CCD UBV photometric and Gaia Data Release 3 (DR3) data to identify the most probable member stars in each cluster based on membership analyses. They determined their color excesses $E(B-V)$ and photometric metallicities [Fe/H] separately using UBV two-color diagrams. The results showed that $E(B-V)$ is $0.590 \pm 0.023$ mag for NGC 189, $0.310 \pm 0.022$ mag for NGC 1758 and $0.640 \pm 0.017$ mag for NGC 7762; while the photometric metallicity [Fe/H] is $-0.08 \pm 0.03$ dex for both NGC 189 and NGC 1758, and $-0.12 \pm 0.02$ dex for NGC 7762 respectively. The authors also obtained distance moduli and ages of the clusters by comparing PARSEC isochrones with the color-magnitude diagrams constructed from UBV and Gaia photometric data while keeping constant color excesses and metallicities for each cluster during this process. They found that the estimated isochrone distance is $1201 \pm 53$ pc for NGC 189, $902 \pm33$ pc for NGC 1758, and $911\pm31$ pc for NGC7762 which are compatible with values obtained from trigonometric parallax measurements; furthermore they determined that the ages of the clusters are 500 Myr $\pm50$, 650 Myr $\pm50$,and 2000 Myr $\pm200$, respectively for NGC189 ,NGC1758 ,andNGC7762 . Additionally, they conducted galactic orbit integration of the clusters to find that while both NGC189 andNGC7762 enter the solar circle during their orbits; NGC1758 completely orbits outside it . Overall, this study provides valuable insights into the properties and characteristics of these open clusters as well as contributes to our understanding of stellar system formation and evolution processes .
Created on 11 Apr. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.