CCD UBV and Gaia DR3 based analysis of NGC 189, NGC 1758 and NGC 7762 open clusters
AI-generated Key Points
- The paper analyzes three open clusters: NGC 189, NGC 1758, and NGC 7762.
- CCD UBV photometric and Gaia Data Release 3 (DR3) data were used to identify member stars in each cluster based on membership analyses.
- Color excesses $E(B-V)$ and photometric metallicities [Fe/H] were determined separately using UBV two-color diagrams.
- Distance moduli and ages of the clusters were obtained by comparing PARSEC isochrones with color-magnitude diagrams constructed from UBV and Gaia photometric data while keeping constant color excesses and metallicities for each cluster during this process.
- The estimated isochrone distance is $1201 \pm 53$ pc for NGC 189, $902 \pm33$ pc for NGC 1758, and $911\pm31$ pc for NGC7762 which are compatible with values obtained from trigonometric parallax measurements.
- The ages of the clusters are 500 Myr $\pm50$, 650 Myr $\pm50$,and 2000 Myr $\pm200$, respectively for
- NGC189 ,NGC1758 ,andNGC7762.
- Galactic orbit integration of the clusters was conducted to find that while both
- NGC189 andNGC7762 enter the solar circle during their orbits;
- NGC1758 completely orbits outside it.
Authors: T. Yontan, S. Bilir, H. Cakmak, M. Raul, T. Banks, E. Soydugan, R. Canbay, S. Tasdemir
Abstract: This paper presents photometric, astrometric, and kinematic analyses of the open clusters NGC 189, NGC 1758 and NGC 7762 based on CCD UBV photometric and Gaia Data Release 3 (DR3) data. According to membership analyses, we identified 32, 57 and 106 most probable member stars with membership probabilities $P\geq 0.5$ in NGC 189, NGC 1758 and NGC 7762, respectively. The color excesses and photometric metallicities of each cluster were determined separately using UBV two-color diagrams. The color excess $E(B-V)$ is $0.590 \pm 0.023$ mag for NGC 189, $0.310 \pm 0.022$ mag for NGC 1758 and $0.640 \pm 0.017$ mag for NGC 7762. The photometric metallicity [Fe/H] is $-0.08 \pm 0.03$ dex for both NGC 189 and NGC 1758, and $-0.12 \pm 0.02$ dex for NGC 7762. Distance moduli and ages of the clusters were obtained by comparing PARSEC isochrones with the color-magnitude diagrams constructed from UBV and Gaia photometric data. During this process, we kept as constant color excess and metallicity for each cluster. The estimated isochrone distance is $1201 \pm 53$ pc for NGC 189, $902 \pm 33$ pc for NGC 1758 and $911 \pm 31$ pc for NGC 7762. These are compatible with the values obtained from trigonometric parallax. Ages of the clusters are $500\pm 50$ Myr, $650\pm 50$ Myr and $2000\pm 200$ Myr for NGC 189, NGC 1758 and NGC 7762, respectively. Galactic orbit integration of the clusters showed that NGC 1758 completely orbits outside the solar circle, while NGC 189 and NGC 7762 enter the solar circle during their orbits.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
Welcome to our AI assistant! Here are some important things to keep in mind:
- The assistant will only answer questions related to this specific paper.
- Please note that this is not a bot for casual chatting.
- If you want the answer in a language other than the language you chose for navigating the website, simply add "TRANSLATE IN LANGUAGE L" at the end of your query (replace "LANGUAGE L" with the language of your choice).
- For example, you could ask "Can you extract the most important aspect of the paper? TRANSLATE IN SPANISH".
- If you want to keep the history of your questions/answers you should create an account.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through atree representation
Look for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.