Thermodynamic crossovers in supercritical fluids

AI-generated keywords: Supercritical Fluids Phase Transitions Crossover Lines Ising Model Thermodynamic

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • The study of phase transitions in supercritical fluids has been a topic of interest for many years
  • Recent experiments and simulations have reported strong evidence of dynamical crossovers above the critical temperature and pressure
  • Existing theoretical explanations generally consider a single crossover line separating liquid-like and gas-like states in the supercritical fluid phase
  • Xinyang Li and Yuliang Jin argue that such a single-line scenario is inconsistent with the supercritical behavior of the Ising model, which has two crossover lines due to its symmetry, violating the universality principle of critical phenomena
  • They define two thermodynamic crossover lines in supercritical fluids as boundaries of liquid-like, indistinguishable and gas-like states
  • Near the critical point, these two crossover lines follow critical scalings with exponents of the Ising universality class
  • This work provides a fundamental framework for understanding supercritical physics in general phase transitions
  • By defining two thermodynamic crossover lines instead of one, it allows for more accurate predictions about how materials will behave under certain conditions
  • This research could have important implications for industries such as energy production or chemical engineering where knowledge about how materials behave at high temperatures and pressures is crucial for optimizing processes.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Xinyang Li, Yuliang Jin

arXiv: 2304.04244v1 - DOI (cond-mat.stat-mech)
23 pages, 21 figures

Abstract: Can liquid-like and gas-like states be distinguished beyond the critical point, where the liquid-gas phase transition no longer exists and conventionally only a single supercritical fluid phase is defined? Recent experiments and simulations report strong evidence of dynamical crossovers above the critical temperature and pressure. Despite using different criteria, existing theoretical explanations generally consider a single crossover line separating liquid-like and gas-like states in the supercritical fluid phase. We argue that such a single-line scenario is inconsistent with the supercritical behavior of the Ising model, which has two crossover lines due to its symmetry, violating the universality principle of critical phenomena. To reconcile the inconsistency, we define two thermodynamic crossover lines in supercritical fluids as boundaries of liquid-like, indistinguishable and gas-like states. Near the critical point, the two crossover lines follow critical scalings with exponents of the Ising universality class, supported by calculations of theoretical models and analyses of experimental data from the standard database. The upper line agrees with crossovers independently estimated from the inelastic X-ray scattering data of supercritical argon, and from the small-angle neutron scattering data of supercritical carbon dioxide. The lower line is verified by the equation of states for the compressibility factor. This work provides a fundamental framework for understanding supercritical physics in general phase transitions.

Submitted to arXiv on 09 Apr. 2023

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2304.04244v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

The study of phase transitions in supercritical fluids has been a topic of interest for many years. However, the question of whether liquid-like and gas-like states can be distinguished beyond the critical point, where the liquid-gas phase transition no longer exists and only a single supercritical fluid phase is defined, remains unanswered. Recent experiments and simulations have reported strong evidence of dynamical crossovers above the critical temperature and pressure. Despite using different criteria, existing theoretical explanations generally consider a single crossover line separating liquid-like and gas-like states in the supercritical fluid phase. In this paper, Xinyang Li and Yuliang Jin argue that such a single-line scenario is inconsistent with the supercritical behavior of the Ising model, which has two crossover lines due to its symmetry, violating the universality principle of critical phenomena. To reconcile this inconsistency, they define two thermodynamic crossover lines in supercritical fluids as boundaries of liquid-like, indistinguishable and gas-like states. Near the critical point, these two crossover lines follow critical scalings with exponents of the Ising universality class. The authors support their argument by conducting calculations on theoretical models and analyzing experimental data from standard databases. They find that the upper line agrees with crossovers independently estimated from inelastic X-ray scattering data of supercritical argon and small-angle neutron scattering data of supercritical carbon dioxide. The lower line is verified by the equation of states for compressibility factor. This work provides a fundamental framework for understanding supercritical physics in general phase transitions. By defining two thermodynamic crossover lines instead of one, it allows for more accurate predictions about how materials will behave under certain conditions. This research could have important implications for industries such as energy production or chemical engineering where knowledge about how materials behave at high temperatures and pressures is crucial for optimizing processes.
Created on 11 Apr. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.