AGAD: Adversarial Generative Anomaly Detection

Authors: Jian Shi, Ni Zhang

Abstract: Anomaly detection suffered from the lack of anomalies due to the diversity of abnormalities and the difficulties of obtaining large-scale anomaly data. Semi-supervised anomaly detection methods are often used to solely leverage normal data to detect abnormalities that deviated from the learnt normality distributions. Meanwhile, given the fact that limited anomaly data can be obtained with a minor cost in practice, some researches also investigated anomaly detection methods under supervised scenarios with limited anomaly data. In order to address the lack of abnormal data for robust anomaly detection, we propose Adversarial Generative Anomaly Detection (AGAD), a self-contrast-based anomaly detection paradigm that learns to detect anomalies by generating \textit{contextual adversarial information} from the massive normal examples. Essentially, our method generates pseudo-anomaly data for both supervised and semi-supervised anomaly detection scenarios. Extensive experiments are carried out on multiple benchmark datasets and real-world datasets, the results show significant improvement in both supervised and semi-supervised scenarios. Importantly, our approach is data-efficient that can boost up the detection accuracy with no more than 5% anomalous training data.

Submitted to arXiv on 09 Apr. 2023

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2304.04211v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

The summary is not ready yet
Created on 28 Apr. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.