Evaluating the Logical Reasoning Ability of ChatGPT and GPT-4

AI-generated keywords: Logical Reasoning GPT-4 ChatGPT RoBERTa Natural Language Understanding

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Logical reasoning is essential for natural language understanding
  • GPT-4 is a new model that has been highlighted as "advanced" in reasoning tasks
  • Multiple logical reasoning datasets were analyzed, including LogiQA, ReClor, and AR-LSAT
  • The study tested multi-choice reading comprehension and natural language inference tasks with benchmarks that require logical reasoning
  • A logical reasoning out-of-distribution dataset was constructed to investigate the robustness of ChatGPT and GPT-4
  • ChatGPT performs significantly better than the RoBERTa fine-tuning method on most logical reasoning benchmarks
  • GPT-4 shows even higher performance on manual tests conducted by the researchers
  • Both models perform relatively well on well-known datasets like LogiQA and ReClor but struggle with newly released and out-of-distribution datasets.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Hanmeng Liu, Ruoxi Ning, Zhiyang Teng, Jian Liu, Qiji Zhou, Yue Zhang

License: CC BY-NC-ND 4.0

Abstract: Harnessing logical reasoning ability is a comprehensive natural language understanding endeavor. With the release of Generative Pretrained Transformer 4 (GPT-4), highlighted as "advanced" at reasoning tasks, we are eager to learn the GPT-4 performance on various logical reasoning tasks. This report analyses multiple logical reasoning datasets, with popular benchmarks like LogiQA and ReClor, and newly-released datasets like AR-LSAT. We test the multi-choice reading comprehension and natural language inference tasks with benchmarks requiring logical reasoning. We further construct a logical reasoning out-of-distribution dataset to investigate the robustness of ChatGPT and GPT-4. We also make a performance comparison between ChatGPT and GPT-4. Experiment results show that ChatGPT performs significantly better than the RoBERTa fine-tuning method on most logical reasoning benchmarks. GPT-4 shows even higher performance on our manual tests. Among benchmarks, ChatGPT and GPT-4 do relatively well on well-known datasets like LogiQA and ReClor. However, the performance drops significantly when handling newly released and out-of-distribution datasets. Logical reasoning remains challenging for ChatGPT and GPT-4, especially on out-of-distribution and natural language inference datasets.

Submitted to arXiv on 07 Apr. 2023

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2304.03439v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

The ability to harness logical reasoning is an essential aspect of natural language understanding. With the recent release of Generative Pretrained Transformer 4 (GPT-4), which has been highlighted as "advanced" in reasoning tasks, there is a growing interest in evaluating its performance on various logical reasoning tasks. In this report, multiple logical reasoning datasets are analyzed, including popular benchmarks like LogiQA and ReClor, as well as newly-released datasets like AR-LSAT. The study tests multi-choice reading comprehension and natural language inference tasks with benchmarks that require logical reasoning. To investigate the robustness of ChatGPT and GPT-4, a logical reasoning out-of-distribution dataset was constructed. A performance comparison between ChatGPT and GPT-4 was also made. The experiment results show that ChatGPT performs significantly better than the RoBERTa fine-tuning method on most logical reasoning benchmarks. Moreover, GPT-4 shows even higher performance on manual tests conducted by the researchers. While ChatGPT and GPT-4 perform relatively well on well-known datasets like LogiQA and ReClor, their performance drops significantly when handling newly released and out-of-distribution datasets. This suggests that logical reasoning remains challenging for both models, especially when dealing with out-of-distribution and natural language inference datasets.
Created on 11 Apr. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.