What makes a good data augmentation for few-shot unsupervised image anomaly detection?
AI-generated Key Points
- The paper explores the effectiveness of data augmentation methods for unsupervised anomaly detection in industrial applications
- Positive samples are often limited due to commercial competition and sample collection difficulties
- Six data augmentation methods are used: Flip, Scale, Translate, Color Jitter, Perspective, and Mixed Data Augmentation
- Experimental results show that there is no universal winner among data augmentation methods for all IAD algorithms
- Combining multiple data augmentation methods does not necessarily yield further improvements in the accuracy of anomaly detection; however, it can achieve excellent results on specific methods
- The study identifies the best single data augmentations for each category of IAD algorithm in each dataset
- Provides useful guidance on selecting appropriate data augmentation methods for different requirements in IAD
- Highlights the importance of carefully selecting an appropriate combination of techniques based on the specific application context rather than relying solely on a single approach.
Authors: Shuheng Zhang, Lingrui Zhang, Guoyang Xie, Jiaqi Liu, Hua Yan, Jinbao Wang, Feng Zheng, Yaochu Jin
Abstract: Data augmentation is a promising technique for unsupervised anomaly detection in industrial applications, where the availability of positive samples is often limited due to factors such as commercial competition and sample collection difficulties. In this paper, how to effectively select and apply data augmentation methods for unsupervised anomaly detection is studied. The impact of various data augmentation methods on different anomaly detection algorithms is systematically investigated through experiments. The experimental results show that the performance of different industrial image anomaly detection (termed as IAD) algorithms is not significantly affected by the specific data augmentation method employed and that combining multiple data augmentation methods does not necessarily yield further improvements in the accuracy of anomaly detection, although it can achieve excellent results on specific methods. These findings provide useful guidance on selecting appropriate data augmentation methods for different requirements in IAD.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through atree representation
Look for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.