Covert learning and disclosure
AI-generated Key Points
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.
- Matteo Escudé presents a model of information acquisition and transmission
- The sender's ability to misreport their findings is limited in the model
- In equilibrium, the sender only influences the receiver by choosing to remain selectively ignorant rather than deceiving them about their discoveries
- The possibility of deception still plays a crucial role in determining what information the sender chooses to acquire and transmit
- Escudé explores comparative statics, characterizing how the sender benefits from claims being more verifiable
- This affects both sender- and receiver-optimal falsification environments
- The research sheds light on how individuals navigate information sharing when they have limited abilities to deceive
- It emphasizes the importance of considering deception possibilities even when they do not occur in equilibrium.
Authors: Matteo Escudé
Abstract: I study a model of information acquisition and transmission in which the sender's ability to misreport her findings is limited. In equilibrium, the sender only influences the receiver by choosing to remain selectively ignorant, rather than by deceiving her about the discoveries. Although deception does not occur, I highlight how deception possibilities determine what information the sender chooses to acquire and transmit. I then turn to comparative statics, characterizing in which sense the sender benefits from her claims being more verifiable, showing this is akin to increasing her commitment power. Finally, I characterize sender- and receiver-optimal falsification environments.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through atree representation
Look for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.