Can Large Language Models Play Text Games Well? Current State-of-the-Art and Open Questions
AI-generated Key Points
- Large language models (LLMs) like ChatGPT and GPT-4 are highly skilled at communicating with humans.
- Researchers from multiple institutions conducted a technical report investigating LLMs' abilities to play text games.
- ChatGPT performs competitively compared to other systems, but still exhibits a low level of intelligence in certain areas.
- ChatGPT cannot construct a world model by playing the game or reading the manual, may fail to leverage existing knowledge, and cannot infer the goal of each step as the game progresses.
- There is currently a lack of certain fundamental properties of intelligence in ChatGPT, although some may emerge in future LLMs as they grow larger.
- Establishing a benchmark to evaluate these properties and tracking their potential advancement is desirable, and researchers are working on this.
- These results raise new research questions about LLMs' capabilities for playing text games at the intersection of artificial intelligence, machine learning, and natural language processing.
Authors: Chen Feng Tsai, Xiaochen Zhou, Sierra S. Liu, Jing Li, Mo Yu, Hongyuan Mei
Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) such as ChatGPT and GPT-4 have recently demonstrated their remarkable abilities of communicating with human users. In this technical report, we take an initiative to investigate their capacities of playing text games, in which a player has to understand the environment and respond to situations by having dialogues with the game world. Our experiments show that ChatGPT performs competitively compared to all the existing systems but still exhibits a low level of intelligence. Precisely, ChatGPT can not construct the world model by playing the game or even reading the game manual; it may fail to leverage the world knowledge that it already has; it cannot infer the goal of each step as the game progresses. Our results open up new research questions at the intersection of artificial intelligence, machine learning, and natural language processing.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
Welcome to our AI assistant! Here are some important things to keep in mind:
- The assistant will only answer questions related to this specific paper.
- Please note that this is not a bot for casual chatting.
- If you want the answer in a language other than the language you chose for navigating the website, simply add "TRANSLATE IN LANGUAGE L" at the end of your query (replace "LANGUAGE L" with the language of your choice).
- For example, you could ask "Can you extract the most important aspect of the paper? TRANSLATE IN SPANISH".
- If you want to keep the history of your questions/answers you should create an account.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through atree representation
Look for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.