Unveiling the Dynamics of Censorship, COVID-19 Regulations, and Protest: An Empirical Study of Chinese Subreddit r/china_irl

AI-generated keywords: Censorship COVID-19 Social Issues China Linguistic Adaptation

AI-generated Key Points

  • COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted social issues that require academic investigation
  • Silenced voices and censored content play a role in mobilizing social movements
  • Study explores relationships among COVID-19 regulations, censorship, and protest in China during 2022
  • Data collected from 1,249 censored articles and metadata/comments from Reddit community r/china_irl
  • Findings reveal patterns in topic recurrence, interplay between censorship activities, user subscription behavior, collective commenting behavior, and linguistic adaptation strategies to circumvent censorship
  • Event plot shows concentrated period of censoring for topics related to one social incident in 2022; censoring activities against topics related to social issues like COVID-19 regulations are more dispersed
  • Study holds significant implications for understanding how marginalized groups survive within censored information ecosystems
  • Research methodology involved Granger causality tests and Pearson correlation analysis to investigate relationship between Reddit user behavior and government censorship behavior; study limits itself to determining correlations rather than causal relationships.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Siyi Zhou, Luca Luceri, Emilio Ferrara

License: CC BY 4.0

Abstract: The COVID-19 pandemic has intensified numerous social issues that warrant academic investigation. Although information dissemination has been extensively studied, the silenced voices and censored content also merit attention due to their role in mobilizing social movements. In this paper, we provide empirical evidence to explore the relationships among COVID-19 regulations, censorship, and protest through a series of social incidents occurred in China during 2022. We analyze the similarities and differences between censored articles and discussions on r/china\_irl, the most popular Chinese-speaking subreddit, and scrutinize the temporal dynamics of government censorship activities and their impact on user engagement within the subreddit. Furthermore, we examine users' linguistic patterns under the influence of a censorship-driven environment. Our findings reveal patterns in topic recurrence, the complex interplay between censorship activities, user subscription, and collective commenting behavior, as well as potential linguistic adaptation strategies to circumvent censorship. These insights hold significant implications for researchers interested in understanding the survival mechanisms of marginalized groups within censored information ecosystems.

Submitted to arXiv on 06 Apr. 2023

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2304.02800v1

The COVID-19 pandemic has brought to light several social issues that require academic investigation. While information dissemination has been extensively studied, the silenced voices and censored content also deserve attention due to their role in mobilizing social movements. This paper provides empirical evidence to explore the relationships among COVID-19 regulations, censorship, and protest through a series of social incidents that occurred in China during 2022. The study collected data from two sources: (i) 1,249 censored articles published since 2019 and (ii) metadata and 1.6 million comments from the Reddit community r/china_irl shared from December 2021 to January 2022. The censored articles were collected from China Digital Times (CDT), which provided the topic of the article in tags that were further refined by the researchers for better generalization of topics. The Reddit data was preprocessed using both Jieba and NLTK, with a Hidden Markov Model (HMM) and Viterbi algorithm used for tokenization. The findings reveal patterns in topic recurrence, the complex interplay between censorship activities, user subscription behavior and collective commenting behavior as well as potential linguistic adaptation strategies to circumvent censorship. Figure 1 shows an event plot indicating when articles on a particular topic were censored; it suggests that while topics related to one social incident were censored for a concentrated period in 2022, censoring activities against topics related to social issues like COVID-19 regulations are more dispersed. Articles integrating multiple social incidents are labeled with the social issues they attempt to discuss such as Zero-COVID-19 or COVID-19 pandemic as a whole; those COVID-19 related articles tend to recur when a COVID-19 related incident happens regardless of censorship risk. This study holds significant implications for researchers interested in understanding how marginalized groups survive within censored information ecosystems. The research methodology involved Granger causality tests and Pearson correlation analysis to investigate the relationship between Reddit user behavior and government censorship behavior; however, the relationship between censorship, commenting, subscribing and linguistic patterns is not straightforward. The study limits itself to determining correlations rather than causal relationships. Overall, this paper provides valuable insights into how censorship affects online discussions in China during the COVID-19 pandemic and highlights potential strategies for circumventing censorship.
Created on 07 Apr. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.