Spectroscopic Orbits of Subsystems in Multiple Stars. X (Summary)

AI-generated keywords: CHIRON Spectroscopic Monitoring Hierarchical Systems Formation Evolution

AI-generated Key Points

  • This paper summarizes a program of spectroscopic monitoring of nearby solar-type stellar hierarchical systems using the CHIRON echelle spectrograph at the 1.5 m telescope since 2015.
  • The program has resulted in ten papers containing 102 spectroscopic orbits, which contribute significantly to our understanding of periods and eccentricities in these systems.
  • The results provide valuable input for studying their formation and early evolution.
  • In addition to the published orbits, this paper presents radial velocities of an additional 91 targets without CHIRON orbits, which are members of wide physical pairs.
  • Ground-based monitoring gives a more accurate and complete picture of nearby hierarchies than Gaia as some NSS orbits have reduced velocity amplitudes or other problems.
  • The distribution of inner periods in hierarchical systems is non-monotonic with a shallow minimum in the 30-100 days bin and a strong excess at shorter periods compared to simple binaries in the field.
  • The period-eccentricity diagram updated by this survey, recent literature, and Gaia displays an interesting structure.
  • Monitoring selected objects from the ground remains a classical approach for finding periods, mass ratios, and orbital eccentricities; it is now complemented by large spectroscopic surveys such as GALAH and LAMOST as well as space missions like Gaia.
  • Current NSS suffers from incompleteness and selection bias resulting in a non-negligible fraction of wrong orbits.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Andrei Tokovinin

arXiv: 2304.02706v1 - DOI (astro-ph.SR)
11 pages, 3 figures, 4 tables. Accepted by The Astronomical Journal
License: CC BY 4.0

Abstract: Results of a large program of spectroscopic monitoring of nearby solar-type stellar hierarchical systems using the CHIRON echelle spectrograph at the 1.5 m telescope are summarized. Ten papers of this series contain 102 spectroscopic orbits and substantially contribute to the knowledge of periods and eccentricties, providing input for the study of their formation and early evolution. Radial velocities of additional 91 targets without CHIRON orbits (members of wide physical pairs) are published here. Our results are compared to the recent Gaia Non-Single Star (NSS) catalog, revealing its strengths and weaknesses. The NSS provides orbital periods for 31 objects of the CHIRON sample (about one third). Of the 22 spectroscopic NSS orbits in common, 14 are in good agreement with CHIRON, the rest have reduced velocity amplitudes or other problems. Hence ground-based monitoring gives, so far, a more accurate and complete picture of nearby hierarchies than Gaia. The distribution of inner periods in hierarchical systems is non-monotonic, showing a shallow minimum in the 30-100 days bin and a strong excess at shorter periods, compared to the smooth distribution of simple binaries in the field. The period-eccentricity diagram of inner subsystems updated by this survey, recent literature, and Gaia, displays an interesting structure.

Submitted to arXiv on 05 Apr. 2023

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2304.02706v1

This paper provides a summary of a large program of spectroscopic monitoring of nearby solar-type stellar hierarchical systems using the CHIRON echelle spectrograph at the 1.5 m telescope. The program has been ongoing since 2015 and has resulted in ten papers containing 102 spectroscopic orbits, which significantly contribute to our understanding of periods and eccentricities in these systems. The results also provide valuable input for studying their formation and early evolution. In addition to the published orbits, this paper presents radial velocities of an additional 91 targets without CHIRON orbits, which are members of wide physical pairs. The authors compare their results to the recent Gaia Non-Single Star (NSS) catalog, which provides orbital periods for about one third of the CHIRON sample. They find that ground-based monitoring gives a more accurate and complete picture of nearby hierarchies than Gaia, as some NSS orbits have reduced velocity amplitudes or other problems. The distribution of inner periods in hierarchical systems is non-monotonic, with a shallow minimum in the 30-100 days bin and a strong excess at shorter periods compared to simple binaries in the field. The period-eccentricity diagram updated by this survey, recent literature, and Gaia displays an interesting structure. The authors note that while monitoring selected objects from the ground remains a classical approach for finding periods, mass ratios, and orbital eccentricities; it is now complemented by large spectroscopic surveys such as GALAH and LAMOST as well as space missions like Gaia. However, they highlight that current NSS suffers from incompleteness and selection bias resulting in a non-negligible fraction of wrong orbits. Overall, this paper provides valuable insights into our understanding of multiple star systems' dynamics through long-term ground-based monitoring programs such as CHIRON. It highlights both strengths and weaknesses associated with different approaches to studying these systems and emphasizes the importance of continued efforts towards improving our understanding of their formation and evolution.
Created on 07 Apr. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.