Unifying Market Microstructure and Dynamic Asset Pricing

AI-generated keywords: Discrete Binary Tree Contingent Claims Market Microstructure Theory Geometric Brownian Motion Financial Markets

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Authors propose a discrete binary tree for pricing contingent claims with underlying securities characterized by discontinuity jumps
  • Discrete nature of financial markets means continuous models cannot accurately describe traders' expectations of future price variations
  • Binary tree model contains classical models of market microstructure theory as special cases
  • Proposed binary tree model allows for accurate pricing of contingent claims in financial markets with discontinuous price movements
  • Underlying price process converges to classical geometric Brownian motion as time interval between trades approaches zero, making it versatile for pricing various types of assets
  • Innovative approach to pricing contingent claims in financial markets with discontinuous price movements
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Davide Lauria, Yuan Hu, W. Brent Lindquist, Svetlozar T. Rachev

arXiv: 2304.02356v1 - DOI (q-fin.MF)
License: CC BY-NC-ND 4.0

Abstract: In this work, we introduce a discrete binary tree for pricing contingent claims with underlying securities that are characterized by discontinuity jumps. The discrete nature of financial markets means that a continuous model is unable to correctly describe the traders' expectations of future price variations. The proposed binary tree contains, as special cases, classical models of market microstructure theory. The underlying price process converges to the classical geometric Brownian motion as the time interval between trades approaches zero.

Submitted to arXiv on 05 Apr. 2023

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2304.02356v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

In their paper titled "Unifying Market Microstructure and Dynamic Asset Pricing," authors Davide Lauria, Yuan Hu, W. Brent Lindquist, and Svetlozar T. Rachev introduce a discrete binary tree for pricing contingent claims with underlying securities that are characterized by discontinuity jumps. The authors argue that the discrete nature of financial markets means that a continuous model is unable to correctly describe traders' expectations of future price variations. To address this issue, they propose a binary tree model which contains classical models of market microstructure theory as special cases. This proposed binary tree model allows for the accurate pricing of contingent claims in financial markets with discontinuous price movements. Furthermore, the underlying price process converges to the classical geometric Brownian motion as the time interval between trades approaches zero, making it a versatile tool for pricing various types of assets. Overall, this paper offers an innovative approach to pricing contingent claims in financial markets with discontinuous price movements. By introducing a discrete binary tree model, the authors provide traders and investors with a more accurate way to predict future price variations and make informed investment decisions.
Created on 09 Apr. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.