## A decomposition strategy for decision problems with endogenous uncertainty using mixed-integer programming

### AI-generated Key Points

- The paper proposes a framework called Decision Programming for solving decision problems with endogenous uncertainty using mixed-integer programming.
- The framework uses influence diagrams to represent decision problems and formulates them as mixed-integer linear programming problems that can be solved using off-the-shelf mathematical optimization solvers.
- The authors incorporate conditional non-anticipativity constraints (C-NACs) into Decision Programming models to address conditionally observed information, which is a type of endogenous uncertainty that received less attention in the introduction of Decision Programming.
- The extended framework allows for simultaneous consideration of the two main types of endogenous uncertainty: decision-dependent information structure and decision-dependent probability distribution.
- A decomposition approach is presented that enables considering continuous decision variables in certain parts of the problem where the original formulation was restricted to discrete variables only.
- Two example problems are illustrated: an illustrative multiperiod game and a large-scale cost-benefit problem regarding climate change mitigation. Neither of these example problems could be solved with existing frameworks.
- The contributions of this paper include two different modeling approaches for considering conditionally observed information and a subdiagram decomposition approach to improve computational efficiency.
- According to Hellemo et al., Type 3 endogenously uncertain stochastic programming (T3ESP) problems have not been discussed in literature before, making this framework particularly valuable for capacity expansion contexts.
- Computational experiments show similar solution times for both approaches but suggest that C-NAC constraints may be more suitable for problems with decision-dependent probability distributions.
- Overall, the proposed framework provides a valuable tool for solving decision problems with endogenous uncertainty and has the potential to address challenging modeling and computational issues in various contexts.

**Authors:**
Olli Herrala,
Tommi Ekholm,
Fabricio Oliveira

**Abstract:** Despite methodological advances for modeling decision problems under uncertainty, faithfully representing endogenous uncertainty still proves challenging, both in terms of modeling capabilities and computational requirements. A novel framework called Decision Programming provides an approach for solving such decision problems using off-the-shelf mathematical optimization solvers. This is made possible by using influence diagrams to represent a given decision problem, which is then formulated as a mixed-integer linear programming problem. In this paper, we focus on the type of endogenous uncertainty that received less attention in the introduction of Decision Programming: conditionally observed information. Multi-stage stochastic programming (MSSP) models use conditional non-anticipativity constraints (C-NACs) to represent such uncertainties, and we show how such constraints can be incorporated into Decision Programming models. This allows us to consider the two main types of endogenous uncertainty simultaneously, namely decision-dependent information structure and decision-dependent probability distribution. Additionally, we present a decomposition approach that provides significant computational savings and also enables considering continuous decision variables in certain parts of the problem, whereas the original formulation was restricted to discrete variables only. The extended framework is illustrated with two example problems. The first considers an illustrative multiperiod game and the second is a large-scale cost-benefit problem regarding climate change mitigation. Neither of these example problems could be solved with existing frameworks.

### Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

**Why do we need votes?**

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

## Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation**Look for similar papers (in beta version)**

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

**Disclaimer:** The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.