Measuring the photo-ionization rate, neutral fraction and mean free path of HI ionizing photons at $4.9 \leq z \leq 6.0$ from a large sample of XShooter and ESI spectra

AI-generated keywords: Lyα forest EX-CITE redshift evolution ionizing radiation field QSO absorption spectra

AI-generated Key Points

  • Gaikwad et al. present a comprehensive study of the Lyα forest at redshifts $4.85<z<6.05$
  • They use a large sample of moderate resolution XShooter and ESI QSO absorption spectra to measure:
  • mean free path ($\lambda_{\rm mfp,HI}$)
  • photo-ionization rate ($\langle \Gamma_{\rm HI} \rangle$)
  • neutral fraction ($\langle f_{\rm HI} \rangle$) of hydrogen in 12 redshift bins
  • They introduce a new code called EXtended reionization based on the Code for Ionization and Temperature Evolution (EX-CITE) to model fluctuations in ionizing radiation field
  • The authors compare their simulations with unprecedented quality QSO absorption spectra taken with XShooter and ESI instruments to measure the three parameters by forward-modeling the Ly$\alpha$ forest and comparing the effective optical depth ($\tau_{\rm eff, HI}$) distribution in simulations and observations
  • They use three statistics of the Lyα forest to further check consistency of their best-fit models with observations:
  • cumulative distribution function of effective optical depth (τeff,HI CDF)
  • cumulative distribution function of dark gap lengths (dark gap statistics)
  • pseudo-Column Density Distribution Function (pCDDF)
  • Their best-fit parameters show significant evolution with redshift such that $\lambda_{\rm mfp,HI}$ and $\langle f_{\rm HI} \rangle$ decrease and increase by a factor of approximately 6 and $10^4$, respectively, from $z \sim 5$ to $z \sim 6$
  • By comparing their parameter evolution with state-of-the-art Aton radiative transfer simulations and Thesan/CoDa-III simulations, they find that their best-fit parameter evolution is consistent with a model in which reionization completes by $z \sim 5.2$
  • Gaikwad et al.'s work provides valuable insights into the properties of hydrogen at high redshifts while demonstrating the effectiveness of their new code EX-CITE for modeling fluctuations in ionizing radiation field
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Prakash Gaikwad, Martin G. Haehnelt, Frederick B. Davies, Sarah E. I. Bosman, Margherita Molaro, Girish Kulkarni, Valentina D'Odorico, George D. Becker, Rebecca L. Davies, Fahad Nasir, James S. Bolton, Laura C. Keating, Vid Iršič, Ewald Puchwein, Yongda Zhu, Shikhar Asthana, Jinyi Yang, Samuel Lai, Anna-Christina Eilers

arXiv: 2304.02038v1 - DOI (astro-ph.CO)
30 pages (+14 pages appendices), 14 figures (+18 figures appendices); submitted to MNRAS; Main results are summarized in Fig. 10, Fig. 11 and Table 3
License: CC BY 4.0

Abstract: We measure the mean free path ($\lambda_{\rm mfp,HI}$), photo-ionization rate ($\langle \Gamma_{\rm HI} \rangle$) and neutral fraction ($\langle f_{\rm HI} \rangle$) of hydrogen in 12 redshift bins at $4.85<z<6.05$ from a large sample of moderate resolution XShooter and ESI QSO absorption spectra. The fluctuations in ionizing radiation field are modeled by post-processing simulations from the Sherwood suite using our new code ''EXtended reionization based on the Code for Ionization and Temperature Evolution'' (EX-CITE). EX-CITE uses efficient Octree summation for computing intergalactic medium attenuation and can generate large number of high resolution $\Gamma_{\rm HI}$ fluctuation models. Our simulation with EX-CITE shows remarkable agreement with simulations performed with the radiative transfer code Aton and can recover the simulated parameters within $1\sigma$ uncertainty. We measure the three parameters by forward-modeling the Ly$\alpha$ forest and comparing the effective optical depth ($\tau_{\rm eff, HI}$) distribution in simulations and observations. The final uncertainties in our measured parameters account for the uncertainties due to thermal parameters, modeling parameters, observational systematics and cosmic variance. Our best fit parameters show significant evolution with redshift such that $\lambda_{\rm mfp,HI}$ and $\langle f_{\rm HI} \rangle$ decreases and increases by a factor $\sim 6$ and $\sim 10^{4}$, respectively from $z \sim 5$ to $z \sim 6$. By comparing our $\lambda_{\rm mfp,HI}$, $\langle \Gamma_{\rm HI} \rangle$ and $\langle f_{\rm HI} \rangle$ evolution with that in state-of-the-art Aton radiative transfer simulations and the Thesan and CoDa-III simulations, we find that our best fit parameter evolution is consistent with a model in which reionization completes by $z \sim 5.2$.

Submitted to arXiv on 04 Apr. 2023

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2304.02038v1

In their recent work, Gaikwad et al. present a comprehensive study of the Lyα forest at redshifts $4.85<z<6.05$, using a large sample of moderate resolution XShooter and ESI QSO absorption spectra to measure the mean free path ($\lambda_{\rm mfp,HI}$), photo-ionization rate ($\langle \Gamma_{\rm HI} \rangle$) and neutral fraction ($\langle f_{\rm HI} \rangle$) of hydrogen in 12 redshift bins. To model the fluctuations in ionizing radiation field, they introduce a new code called EXtended reionization based on the Code for Ionization and Temperature Evolution (EX-CITE), which uses efficient Octree summation for computing intergalactic medium attenuation and can generate a large number of high-resolution $\Gamma_{\rm HI}$ fluctuation models. The authors compare their simulations with unprecedented quality QSO absorption spectra taken with XShooter and ESI instruments to measure the three parameters by forward-modeling the Ly$\alpha$ forest and comparing the effective optical depth ($\tau_{\rm eff, HI}$) distribution in simulations and observations. They use three statistics of the Lyα forest - cumulative distribution function of effective optical depth (τeff,HI CDF), cumulative distribution function of dark gap lengths (dark gap statistics), and pseudo-Column Density Distribution Function (pCDDF) - to further check the consistency of their best-fit models with observations. The accuracy of their measurements is usually limited by noise properties of spectra; however, they calculate effective optical depth for each sightline as τeff,HI = −ln(F/Fcont), where F is normalized flux. The uncertainties are calculated by considering uncertainties in mean flux that also account for uncertainty in continuum placement. Their best-fit parameters show significant evolution with redshift such that $\lambda_{\rm mfp,HI}$ and $\langle f_{\rm HI} \rangle$ decrease and increase by a factor of approximately 6 and $10^4$, respectively, from $z \sim 5$ to $z \sim 6$. By comparing their $\lambda_{\rm mfp,HI}$, $\langle \Gamma_{\rm HI} \rangle$, and $\langle f_{\rm HI} \rangle$ evolution with that in state-of-the-art Aton radiative transfer simulations and the Thesan and CoDa-III simulations, they find that their best-fit parameter evolution is consistent with a model in which reionization completes by $z \sim 5.2$. Overall, Gaikwad et al. 's work provides valuable insights into the properties of hydrogen at high redshifts while demonstrating the effectiveness of their new code EX-CITE for modeling fluctuations in ionizing radiation field. Their results suggest that reionization may have completed by $z=5.2$.
Created on 06 Apr. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.