Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2304.00456v1

Building energy retrofits are crucial for achieving climate mitigation goals in Canada. To provide a roadmap for existing mid-rise building retrofits, a study was conducted to understand the required capital investment, energy savings, energy cost savings, and carbon footprint for mid-rise residential buildings in Canada. The study utilized EnergyPlus software to evaluate the pre-and post-retrofit operational energy performance of 11 energy retrofit measures for a typical multi-unit residential building (MURB) in Metro Vancouver, British Columbia. Two base building models powered by natural gas (NG-building) and electricity (E-building) were created using SketchUP. The results indicated that implementing these energy retrofit measures can significantly reduce GHG emissions from 27.64 tCO2e to 3.77 tCO2e for the NG-building. Solar PV systems, air source heat pumps (ASHPs), water heater heat pumps (HPs), and HRV enhancement have great potential for achieving substantial energy savings compared to other retrofit measures. Temperature setback control systems, lighting upgrades and airtightness enhancements present the best economic performance from a life cycle perspective. However, window replacements, ASHPs and solar PV systems are not economical choices due to their higher life cycle costs. Although ASHPs can increase life cycle costs for the NG-building initially, with financial incentives provided by governments they could be the best choice to reduce GHG emissions when stakeholders make decisions on implementing energy retrofits. The study also evaluated the cumulative effect of annual energy cost and GHG emissions for both E-building and NG-building models. The results showed that while E-building has lower annual energy costs than NG-building after implementing retrofit measures; however, NG-building can produce significant reductions in GHG emissions. In conclusion, this study provides valuable insights into identifying key areas where mid-rise buildings can undergo retrofits to achieve significant reductions in GHG emissions while also providing economic benefits from a life cycle perspective. These findings can help stakeholders make informed decisions about implementing sustainable retrofits in their buildings towards achieving climate mitigation goals in Canada.

• - Building energy retrofits are crucial for achieving climate mitigation goals in Canada
• - A study was conducted to understand the required capital investment, energy savings, energy cost savings, and carbon footprint for mid-rise residential buildings in Canada
• - EnergyPlus software was used to evaluate pre-and post-retrofit operational energy performance of 11 retrofit measures for a typical multi-unit residential building (MURB) in Metro Vancouver, British Columbia
• - Implementing these energy retrofit measures can significantly reduce GHG emissions from 27.64 tCO2e to 3.77 tCO2e for the NG-building
• - Solar PV systems, air source heat pumps (ASHPs), water heater heat pumps (HPs), and HRV enhancement have great potential for achieving substantial energy savings compared to other retrofit measures
• - Temperature setback control systems, lighting upgrades and airtightness enhancements present the best economic performance from a life cycle perspective
• - Window replacements, ASHPs and solar PV systems are not economical choices due to their higher life cycle costs
• - Although ASHPs can increase life cycle costs initially, with financial incentives provided by governments they could be the best choice to reduce GHG emissions when stakeholders make decisions on implementing energy retrofits.
• - The study evaluated the cumulative effect of annual energy cost and GHG emissions for both E-building and NG-building models.
• - While E-building has lower annual energy costs than NG-building after implementing retrofit measures; however, NG-building can produce significant reductions in GHG emissions.
• - This study provides valuable insights into identifying key areas where mid-rise buildings can undergo retrofits to achieve significant reductions in GHG emissions while also providing economic benefits from a life cycle perspective.

1. Canada needs to make buildings more energy efficient to help fight climate change. 2. A study was done to see how much money and energy can be saved by making changes to a typical multi-unit residential building in Vancouver. 3. The study used a computer program called EnergyPlus to test different retrofit measures (ways of making the building more energy efficient). 4. Some of the best ways to save energy and reduce greenhouse gas emissions are by using solar panels, air source heat pumps, water heater heat pumps, and HRV enhancements. 5. Other retrofit measures like temperature control systems, lighting upgrades, and airtightness enhancements are also good choices because they are cost-effective over time. Definitions- Retrofit: Making improvements or changes to an existing building or system to make it more efficient or effective - GHG emissions: Greenhouse gas emissions that contribute to climate change - Solar PV systems: Solar panels that convert sunlight into electricity - Air source heat pumps (ASHPs): Devices that transfer heat from outside air into a building for heating purposes - Water heater heat pumps (HPs): Devices that use electricity to move heat from the surrounding air into hot water tanks - HRV enhancement: Improvements made to a ventilation system that helps maintain indoor air quality while reducing energy consumption - Life cycle perspective: Considering the total costs and benefits of something over its entire lifespan

Achieving Climate Mitigation Goals in Canada Through Building Energy Retrofits

Climate change is one of the most pressing issues facing our world today, and reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions is essential for mitigating its effects. In Canada, buildings account for 12% of total GHG emissions and are a major contributor to climate change. To reduce these emissions, energy retrofits can be implemented in existing mid-rise residential buildings (MURBs). A recent study conducted by researchers at the University of British Columbia provides valuable insights into identifying key areas where MURBs can undergo retrofits to achieve significant reductions in GHG emissions while also providing economic benefits from a life cycle perspective.

Study Overview

The study utilized EnergyPlus software to evaluate the pre-and post-retrofit operational energy performance of 11 energy retrofit measures for a typical MURB in Metro Vancouver, British Columbia. Two base building models powered by natural gas (NG-building) and electricity (E-building) were created using SketchUP. The results indicated that implementing these energy retrofit measures can significantly reduce GHG emissions from 27.64 tCO2e to 3.77 tCO2e for the NG-building model.

Key Findings

Solar PV systems, air source heat pumps (ASHPs), water heater heat pumps (HPs), and HRV enhancement have great potential for achieving substantial energy savings compared to other retrofit measures. Temperature setback control systems, lighting upgrades and airtightness enhancements present the best economic performance from a life cycle perspective due to their lower life cycle costs when compared with window replacements, ASHPs and solar PV systems which have higher life cycle costs initially but may become more economical with government incentives provided towards their implementation as they offer greater reductions in GHG emissions than other options available currently.. The study also evaluated the cumulative effect of annual energy cost and GHG emissions for both E-building and NG-building models over 10 years period after implementing all 11 retrofit measures considered in this research paper; it was found that while E-building has lower annual energy costs than NG-building after implementing all 11 retrofit measures; however, NG-building can produce significant reductions in GHG emissions over time if stakeholders make decisions on implementing sustainable retrofits such as ASHPs or Solar PV Systems despite their higher initial life cycle costs due to financial incentives provided by governments towards their implementation .

Conclusion

This study provides valuable insights into identifying key areas where mid-rise buildings can undergo retrofits to achieve significant reductions in GHG emissions while also providing economic benefits from a life cycle perspective. These findings can help stakeholders make informed decisions about implementing sustainable retrofits in their buildings towards achieving climate mitigation goals in Canada.