Life cycle costing analysis of deep energy retrofits of a mid-rise building to understand the impact of energy conservation measures
AI-generated Key Points
- Building energy retrofits are crucial for achieving climate mitigation goals in Canada
- A study was conducted to understand the required capital investment, energy savings, energy cost savings, and carbon footprint for mid-rise residential buildings in Canada
- EnergyPlus software was used to evaluate pre-and post-retrofit operational energy performance of 11 retrofit measures for a typical multi-unit residential building (MURB) in Metro Vancouver, British Columbia
- Implementing these energy retrofit measures can significantly reduce GHG emissions from 27.64 tCO2e to 3.77 tCO2e for the NG-building
- Solar PV systems, air source heat pumps (ASHPs), water heater heat pumps (HPs), and HRV enhancement have great potential for achieving substantial energy savings compared to other retrofit measures
- Temperature setback control systems, lighting upgrades and airtightness enhancements present the best economic performance from a life cycle perspective
- Window replacements, ASHPs and solar PV systems are not economical choices due to their higher life cycle costs
- Although ASHPs can increase life cycle costs initially, with financial incentives provided by governments they could be the best choice to reduce GHG emissions when stakeholders make decisions on implementing energy retrofits.
- The study evaluated the cumulative effect of annual energy cost and GHG emissions for both E-building and NG-building models.
- While E-building has lower annual energy costs than NG-building after implementing retrofit measures; however, NG-building can produce significant reductions in GHG emissions.
- This study provides valuable insights into identifying key areas where mid-rise buildings can undergo retrofits to achieve significant reductions in GHG emissions while also providing economic benefits from a life cycle perspective.
Authors: Haonan Zhang
Abstract: Building energy retrofits have been identified as key to realizing climate mitigation goals in Canada. This study aims to provide a roadmap for existing mid-rise building retrofits in order to understand the required capital investment, energy savings, energy cost savings, and carbon footprint for mid-rise residential buildings in Canada. This study employed EnergyPlus to examine the energy performance of 11 energy retrofit measures for a typical multi-unit residential building (MURB) in Metro Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. The author employed the energy simulation software (EnergyPlus) to evaluate the pre-and post-retrofit operational energy performance of the selected MURB. Two base building models powered by natural gas (NG-building) and electricity (E-building) were created by SketchUP. The energy simulation results were combined with cost and emission impact data to evaluate the economic and environmental performance of the selected energy retrofit measures. The results indicated that the NG-building can produce significant GHG emission reductions (from 27.64 tCO2e to 3.77 tCO2e) by implementing these energy retrofit measures. In terms of energy savings, solar PV, ASHP, water heater HP, and HRV enhancement have great energy saving potential compared to other energy retrofit measures. In addition, temperature setback, lighting, and airtightness enhancement present the best economic performance from a life cycle perspective. However, windows, ASHP, and solar PV, are not economical choices because of higher life cycle costs. While ASHP can increase life cycle costs for the NG-building, with the financial incentives provided by the governments, ASHP could be the best choice to reduce GHG emissions when stakeholders make decisions on implementing energy retrofits.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
Welcome to our AI assistant! Here are some important things to keep in mind:
- The assistant will only answer questions related to this specific paper.
- Please note that this is not a bot for casual chatting.
- If you want the answer in a language other than the language you chose for navigating the website, simply add "TRANSLATE IN LANGUAGE L" at the end of your query (replace "LANGUAGE L" with the language of your choice).
- For example, you could ask "Can you extract the most important aspect of the paper? TRANSLATE IN SPANISH".
- If you want to keep the history of your questions/answers you should create an account.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through atree representation
Look for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.