A 1.3% distance to M33 from HST Cepheid photometry
AI-generated Key Points
- The study presents a low-dispersion period-luminosity (PL) relation based on 154 Cepheids in Messier 33 (M33), a nearby type Sc II-III spiral galaxy.
- Hubble Space Telescope (HST) photometry from the PHATTER survey is used, and high-quality ground-based light curves are employed to recover Cepheid phases and amplitudes for multi-epoch HST data.
- Template fitting is performed to derive intensity-averaged mean magnitudes.
- The HST observations in the SH0ES near-infrared Wesenheit system significantly reduce the effect of crowding relative to ground-based data, resulting in a final PL scatter of $\sigma$ = 0.11 mag.
- The absolute calibration of the PL is adopted based on HST observations in the Large Magellanic Cloud (LMC), and a distance derived using late-type detached eclipsing binaries is used to obtain a distance modulus for M33 of $\mu$ = 24.622 $\pm$ 0.030 mag (d = 840 $\pm$ 11 kpc), with a best-to-date precision of 1.3%.
- This result shows very good agreement with past Cepheid-based measurements, while several TRGB estimates bracket their result but disagree with each other.
- Star clusters hosting Cepheids in M33 do not have an impact on the distance measurement; only 3.7% of the sample is located in or nearby young clusters.
- M33 offers one of the best sites for cross-calibration of many primary distance indicators, making it an essential anchor point for measuring the Hubble constant accurately and precisely.
- Overall, this study provides crucial insights into improving our understanding of cosmic distances and refining our knowledge about fundamental cosmological parameters such as the Hubble constant.
Authors: Louise Breuval, Adam G. Riess, Lucas M. Macri, Siyang Li, Wenlong Yuan, Stefano Casertano, Tarini Konchady, Boris Trahin, Meredith J. Durbin, Benjamin F. Williams
Abstract: We present a low-dispersion period-luminosity relation (PL) based on 154 Cepheids in Messier 33 (M33) with Hubble Space Telescope (HST) photometry from the PHATTER survey. Using high-quality ground-based light curves, we recover Cepheid phases and amplitudes for multi-epoch HST data and we perform template fitting to derive intensity-averaged mean magnitudes. HST observations in the SH0ES near-infrared Wesenheit system significantly reduce the effect of crowding relative to ground-based data, as seen in the final PL scatter of $\sigma$ = 0.11 mag. We adopt the absolute calibration of the PL based on HST observations in the Large Magellanic Cloud (LMC) and a distance derived using late-type detached eclipsing binaries to obtain a distance modulus for M33 of $\mu$ = 24.622 $\pm$ 0.030 mag (d = 840 $\pm$ 11 kpc), a best-to-date precision of 1.3%. We find very good agreement with past Cepheid-based measurements. Several TRGB estimates bracket our result while disagreeing with each other. Finally, we show that the flux contribution from star clusters hosting Cepheids in M33 does not impact the distance measurement and we find only 3.7% of the sample is located in (or nearby) young clusters. M33 offers one of the best sites for the cross-calibration of many primary distance indicators. Thus, a precise independent geometric determination of its distance would provide a valuable new anchor to measure the Hubble constant.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
Welcome to our AI assistant! Here are some important things to keep in mind:
- The assistant will only answer questions related to this specific paper.
- Please note that this is not a bot for casual chatting.
- If you want the answer in a language other than the language you chose for navigating the website, simply add "TRANSLATE IN LANGUAGE L" at the end of your query (replace "LANGUAGE L" with the language of your choice).
- For example, you could ask "Can you extract the most important aspect of the paper? TRANSLATE IN SPANISH".
- If you want to keep the history of your questions/answers you should create an account.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through atree representation
Look for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.