Polarity on $H$-split graphs
AI-generated Key Points
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.
- The paper explores the concept of $(s,k)$-polar partitions in graph theory.
- An $(s,k)$-polar partition is a partition of a graph's vertex set, such that the induced subgraph $G[A]$ is a complete multipartite graph with at most $s$ parts and the complement of the induced subgraph $\overline{G[B]}$ is also a complete multipartite graph with at most $k$ parts.
- The authors focus on two classes of graphs that generalize split graphs and provide efficient algorithms to determine whether these classes admit an $(s,k)$-polar partition for any values of $s$, including infinity.
- They also provide upper bounds for the order of minimal $(s,k)$-polar obstructions on these families of graphs.
- The paper provides detailed proofs and analysis to support their findings.
- This work sheds light on how polar partitions can be used to understand and classify certain types of graphs beyond split graphs.
Authors: F. Esteban Contreras Mendoza, César Hernández Cruz
Abstract: Given nonnegative integers, $s$ and $k$, an $(s,k)$-polar partition of a graph $G$ is a partition $(A,B)$ of $V_G$ such that $G[A]$ and $\overline{G[B]}$ are complete multipartite graphs with at most $s$ and $k$ parts, respectively. If $s$ or $k$ is replaced by $\infty$, it means that there is no restriction on the number of parts of $G[A]$ or $\overline{G[B]}$, respectively. A graph admitting a $(1,1)$-polar partition is usually called a split graph. In this work, we present some results related to $(s,k)$-polar partitions on two graph classes generalizing split graphs. Our main results include efficient algorithms to decide whether a graph on these classes admits an $(s,k)$-polar partition, as well as upper bounds for the order of minimal $(s,k)$-polar obstructions on such graph families for any $s$ and $k$ (even if $s$ or $k$ is $\infty$).
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Score: 0
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.