Legged Robots for Object Manipulation: A Review

AI-generated keywords: Legged Robots Object Manipulation Traversing Difficult Terrains Human-Centric Environments Home Robotics

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Legged robots have potential in manipulating objects in challenging environments
  • Existing research on legged robotics has focused on traversing difficult terrains, but some demonstrations show they can also move objects
  • The review categorizes existing works into four main manipulation methods: object interactions without grasping, manipulation with walking legs, dedicated non-locomotive arms, and legged teams
  • Each method has different design features and autonomy levels
  • Quantitative comparisons are provided for the range of possible relative sizes of manipulated objects with respect to the robot based on a few simplifying assumptions
  • New directions for research in legged robot manipulation include multifunctional limbs, terrain modeling, or learning-based control
  • Advancements could support new deployments in challenging indoor/outdoor scenarios such as warehouses/construction sites, preserved natural areas, and especially home robotics.
  • Continued research is needed to develop more advanced legged robotic systems capable of performing complex tasks in human-centric environments.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Yifeng Gong, Ge Sun, Aditya Nair, Aditya Bidwai, Raghuram CS, John Grezmak, Guillaume Sartoretti, Kathryn A. Daltorio

Preprint of the paper submitted to Frontiers in Mechanical Engineering

Abstract: Legged robots can have a unique role in manipulating objects in dynamic, human-centric, or otherwise inaccessible environments. Although most legged robotics research to date typically focuses on traversing these challenging environments, many legged platform demonstrations have also included "moving an object" as a way of doing tangible work. Legged robots can be designed to manipulate a particular type of object (e.g., a cardboard box, a soccer ball, or a larger piece of furniture), by themselves or collaboratively. The objective of this review is to collect and learn from these examples, to both organize the work done so far in the community and highlight interesting open avenues for future work. This review categorizes existing works into four main manipulation methods: object interactions without grasping, manipulation with walking legs, dedicated non-locomotive arms, and legged teams. Each method has different design and autonomy features, which are illustrated by available examples in the literature. Based on a few simplifying assumptions, we further provide quantitative comparisons for the range of possible relative sizes of the manipulated object with respect to the robot. Taken together, these examples suggest new directions for research in legged robot manipulation, such as multifunctional limbs, terrain modeling, or learning-based control, to support a number of new deployments in challenging indoor/outdoor scenarios in warehouses/construction sites, preserved natural areas, and especially for home robotics.

Submitted to arXiv on 29 Mar. 2023

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2303.16865v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

This review article titled "Legged Robots for Object Manipulation: A Review" explores the potential of legged robots in manipulating objects in challenging environments that are inaccessible to humans. While most research on legged robotics has focused on traversing difficult terrains, some demonstrations have shown that these robots can also move objects as a way of doing tangible work. The authors aim to collect and learn from these examples to organize the work done so far in the community and highlight interesting avenues for future research. The review categorizes existing works into four main manipulation methods: object interactions without grasping, manipulation with walking legs, dedicated non-locomotive arms, and legged teams. Each method has different design features and autonomy levels, which are illustrated by available examples in the literature. The authors further provide quantitative comparisons for the range of possible relative sizes of manipulated objects with respect to the robot based on a few simplifying assumptions. The examples presented suggest new directions for research in legged robot manipulation such as multifunctional limbs, terrain modeling, or learning-based control. These advancements could support new deployments in challenging indoor/outdoor scenarios such as warehouses/construction sites, preserved natural areas, and especially home robotics. Overall, this review provides valuable insights into how legged robots can be designed to manipulate various types of objects collaboratively or independently. It highlights the potential applications of these robots beyond just traversing difficult terrains and emphasizes the need for continued research in this field to develop more advanced legged robotic systems capable of performing complex tasks in human-centric environments.
Created on 13 May. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.