Switched Moving Boundary Modeling of Phase Change Thermal Energy Storage Systems

AI-generated keywords: Thermal Energy Storage Phase Change Materials Fixed Grid Moving Boundary Finite State Machine

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Thermal Energy Storage (TES) devices with Phase Change Materials (PCMs) are important in thermal management systems
  • TES devices use constant-temperature thermal capacity of PCMs to decouple absorption and rejection of thermal energy
  • Control-oriented models of TES are necessary for predicting behavior and making informed control decisions
  • A switched Moving Boundary (MB) model captures key dynamics of TES with fewer dynamic states
  • MB model uses graph-based modeling approach to represent heat flow through TES and a MB approach to model time-varying liquid and solid regions of PCM
  • Finite State Machine (FSM) is used to switch between four different modes of operation based on State-of-Charge (SOC) of TES
  • Numerical simulations show that the proposed MB approach accurately models behavior while using far fewer states, leading to five times faster simulations
  • MB models can be effective tools for predicting TES behavior and making informed control decisions in various thermal management systems.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Trent J. Sakakini, Justin P. Koeln

7 pages, 6 figures

Abstract: Thermal Energy Storage (TES) devices, which leverage the constant-temperature thermal capacity of the latent heat of a Phase Change Material (PCM), provide benefits to a variety of thermal management systems by decoupling the absorption and rejection of thermal energy. While performing a role similar to a battery in an electrical system, it is critical to know when to charge (freeze) and discharge (melt) the TES to maximize the capabilities and efficiency of the overall system. Therefore, control-oriented models of TES are needed to predict the behavior of the TES and make informed control decisions. While existing modeling approaches divide the TES in to multiple sections using a Fixed Grid (FG) approach, this paper proposes a switched Moving Boundary (MB) model that captures the key dynamics of the TES with significantly fewer dynamic states. Specifically, a graph-based modeling approach is used to model the heat flow through the TES and a MB approach is used to model the time-varying liquid and solid regions of the TES. Additionally, a Finite State Machine (FSM) is used to switch between four different modes of operation based on the State-of-Charge (SOC) of the TES. Numerical simulations comparing the proposed approach with a more traditional FG approach show that the MB model is capable of accurately modeling the behavior of the FG model while using far fewer states, leading to five times faster simulations.

Submitted to arXiv on 28 Mar. 2023

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2303.15687v2

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

Thermal Energy Storage (TES) devices that use Phase Change Materials (PCMs) are becoming increasingly important in thermal management systems. TES devices leverage the constant-temperature thermal capacity of PCMs to decouple the absorption and rejection of thermal energy, similar to how batteries function in electrical systems. To maximize its efficiency and capabilities, control-oriented models of TES are necessary to predict its behavior and make informed control decisions. This paper proposes a switched Moving Boundary (MB) model that captures the key dynamics of the TES with significantly fewer dynamic states. The MB model uses a graph-based modeling approach to represent heat flow through the TES and a MB approach to model the time-varying liquid and solid regions of the PCM. Additionally, a Finite State Machine (FSM) is used to switch between four different modes of operation based on the State-of-Charge (SOC) of the TES. Numerical simulations comparing the proposed MB approach with traditional Fixed Grid (FG) approaches show that it accurately models the behavior of FG models while using far fewer states, leading to five times faster simulations. This makes it an attractive option for real-time control applications where speed is critical. Their research highlights how MB models can be used as effective tools for predicting TES behavior and making informed control decisions in various thermal management systems.
Created on 20 Apr. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.