Pedestrian Behavior Interacting with Autonomous Vehicles: Role of AV Operation and Signal Indication and Roadway Infrastructure

AI-generated keywords: Autonomous Vehicles Pedestrians Signal Indications Roadway Infrastructure Virtual Reality Simulations

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Interaction between autonomous vehicles (AVs) and pedestrians is a complex challenge
  • Study conducted using virtual reality simulations to understand how AV operations, signal indications, and roadway infrastructure affect pedestrian behavior
  • AV signal significantly impacted pedestrians' accepted gap, walking time, and waiting time
  • Pedestrians tended to choose the largest open gap between cars when the AV showed no signal
  • When the AV displayed a yellow signal indication, pedestrians had slower crossing speeds
  • Roadway infrastructure also played a role in affecting pedestrian behavior by influencing their walking time and waiting time
  • Importance of considering various factors when designing AVs for safe interaction with pedestrians
  • Understanding how AV operations and signals impact pedestrian behavior can help create more effective systems that prioritize safety for all road users.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Fengjiao Zou, Jennifer Ogle, Weimin Jin, Patrick Gerard, Daniel Petty, Andrew Robb

Abstract: Interacting with pedestrians is challenging for Autonomous vehicles (AVs). This study evaluates how AV operations /associated signaling and roadway infrastructure affect pedestrian behavior in virtual reality. AVs were designed with different operations and signal indications, including negotiating with no signal, negotiating with a yellow signal, and yellow/blue negotiating/no-yield indications. Results show that AV signal significantly impacts pedestrians' accepted gap, walking time, and waiting time. Pedestrians chose the largest open gap between cars with AV showing no signal, and had the slowest crossing speed with AV showing a yellow signal indication. Roadway infrastructure affects pedestrian walking time and waiting time.

Submitted to arXiv on 27 Mar. 2023

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2303.15352v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

The interaction between autonomous vehicles (AVs) and pedestrians is a complex challenge that requires careful consideration of AV operations, signal indications, and roadway infrastructure. To better understand how these factors affect pedestrian behavior, a study was conducted using virtual reality simulations. The AVs in the simulations were designed with different operations and signal indications, including negotiating with no signal, negotiating with a yellow signal, and yellow/blue negotiating/no-yield indications. The results of the study showed that the AV signal significantly impacted pedestrians' accepted gap, walking time, and waiting time. Pedestrians tended to choose the largest open gap between cars when the AV showed no signal. However, when the AV displayed a yellow signal indication, pedestrians had slower crossing speeds. Roadway infrastructure also played a role in affecting pedestrian behavior by influencing their walking time and waiting time. Overall, this study highlights the importance of considering various factors when designing AVs for safe interaction with pedestrians. By understanding how AV operations and signals impact pedestrian behavior in different scenarios, designers can create more effective systems that prioritize safety for all road users.
Created on 29 Mar. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.