Adapting Pretrained Language Models for Solving Tabular Prediction Problems in the Electronic Health Record
AI-generated Key Points
- The study proposes an approach for adapting pretrained language models to solve tabular prediction problems in the electronic health record (EHR) domain
- DeBERTa model is adapted using domain adaptation techniques to predict emergency department outcomes using the MIMIC-IV-ED dataset
- Pretraining a small DeBERTa model on a dataset consisting of MIMIC-III discharge summaries, clinical notes, radiology reports, and PubMed abstracts
- Proposed approach outperforms other models on two of three benchmark tasks for emergency department outcomes (p<0.001) and matches performance on the third task
- Inclusion of free text data and descriptive columns version of the dataset resulted in better model performance, highlighting the importance of data processing and mixing free text and tabular data in EHR datasets
- Small DeBERTa models can achieve competitive performance when fine-tuned on EHR datasets, which is important for compute-constrained settings such as hospitals
- Attribution scores were used to determine the importance of different input features in machine learning models, providing insights into factors influencing patient outcomes and pinpointing potentially modifiable risk factors
- This study presents a promising approach for adapting pretrained language models to solve tabular prediction problems in EHR domains with potential applications in improving decision-making and patient outcomes in healthcare settings while further evaluation is needed on a wider range of tasks and direct comparison with larger models
Authors: Christopher McMaster, David FL Liew, Douglas EV Pires
Abstract: We propose an approach for adapting the DeBERTa model for electronic health record (EHR) tasks using domain adaptation. We pretrain a small DeBERTa model on a dataset consisting of MIMIC-III discharge summaries, clinical notes, radiology reports, and PubMed abstracts. We compare this model's performance with a DeBERTa model pre-trained on clinical texts from our institutional EHR (MeDeBERTa) and an XGBoost model. We evaluate performance on three benchmark tasks for emergency department outcomes using the MIMIC-IV-ED dataset. We preprocess the data to convert it into text format and generate four versions of the original datasets to compare data processing and data inclusion. The results show that our proposed approach outperforms the alternative models on two of three tasks (p<0.001) and matches performance on the third task, with the use of descriptive columns improving performance over the original column names.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
Welcome to our AI assistant! Here are some important things to keep in mind:
- The assistant will only answer questions related to this specific paper.
- Please note that this is not a bot for casual chatting.
- If you want the answer in a language other than the language you chose for navigating the website, simply add "TRANSLATE IN LANGUAGE L" at the end of your query (replace "LANGUAGE L" with the language of your choice).
- For example, you could ask "Can you extract the most important aspect of the paper? TRANSLATE IN SPANISH".
- If you want to keep the history of your questions/answers you should create an account.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
Look for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.