Implications of evaporative cooling by H$_2$ for 1I/`Oumuamua

AI-generated keywords: 1I/`Oumuamua H$_2$ Cosmic Rays Thermal Annealing Evaporation

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • In 2017, the first interstellar object observed in our solar system, 1I/`Oumuamua, exhibited several peculiar properties.
  • A recent study by Bergner and Seligman (2023) proposed that evaporation of trapped H$_2$ created by cosmic rays (CRs) can explain the non-gravitational acceleration.
  • However, a new study by Thiem Hoang and Abraham Loeb has shown that Bergner and Seligman's calculation of surface temperature ignored the crucial cooling effect of evaporating H$_2$.
  • By taking into account the cooling by H$_2$ evaporation, they found that the surface temperature of H$_2$-water ice is lower than the temperature obtained by Bergner and Seligman (2023) by a factor of 9.
  • This means that the thermal speed of outgassing H$_2$ is decreased by a factor of 3. As a result, all H$_2$ from water ice would need to be dissociated by CRs in the interstellar medium, making Bergner and Seligman's model untenable as an explanation for the properties of 1I/`Oumuamua.
  • Hoang and Loeb also found that the lower surface temperature influences the thermal annealing of water ice which is a key process appealed to by Bergner and Seligman (2023).
  • The lower surface temperature means that less energy is available for thermal annealing to occur. Therefore their results suggest that alternative explanations are needed for the peculiar properties observed in 1I/`Oumuamua.
  • This study highlights how important it is to consider all relevant physical processes when developing models to explain astronomical observations.
  • It also demonstrates how scientific knowledge can evolve through ongoing research and refinement.
  • Bullet points:
  • First interstellar object observed in our solar system, 1I/`Oumuamua, exhibited peculiar properties
  • Bergner and Seligman (2023) proposed evaporation of trapped H$_2$ created by cosmic rays can explain non-gravitational acceleration
  • Hoang and Loeb found Bergner and Seligman's calculation of surface temperature ignored crucial cooling effect of evaporating H$_2$
  • Surface temperature of H$_2$-water ice is lower than temperature obtained by Bergner and Seligman (2023) by a factor of 9
  • Thermal
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Thiem Hoang, Abraham Loeb

arXiv: 2303.13861v1 - DOI (astro-ph.GA)
Submitted for peer review, 4 pages, 2 figures. arXiv admin note: substantial text overlap with arXiv:2006.08088

Abstract: The first interstellar object observed in our solar system, 1I/`Oumuamua, exhibited several peculiar properties, including extreme elongation and non-gravitational acceleration. \cite{Bergner.2023} proposed that evaporation of trapped H$_2$ created by cosmic rays (CRs) can explain the non-gravitational acceleration. However, their calculation of surface temperature ignored the crucial cooling effect of evaporating H$_2$. By taking into account the cooling by H$_2$ evaporation, we show that the surface temperature of H$_2$-water ice is lower than the temperature obtained by Bergner and Seligman (2023) by a factor of 9. As a result, the thermal speed of outgassing H$_2$ is decreased by a factor of 3, which requires that all H$_2$ from water ice is dissociated by CRs in the interstellar medium, making the model untenable as an explanation for the properties of 1I/`Oumuamua. Moreover, the lower surface temperature also influences the thermal annealing of water ice, a key process that is appealed to by Bergner and Seligman (2023) as a mechanism to release H$_2$.

Submitted to arXiv on 24 Mar. 2023

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2303.13861v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

In 2017, the first interstellar object observed in our solar system, 1I/`Oumuamua, exhibited several peculiar properties, including extreme elongation and non-gravitational acceleration. A recent study by Bergner and Seligman (2023) proposed that evaporation of trapped H$_2$ created by cosmic rays (CRs) can explain the non-gravitational acceleration. However, a new study by Thiem Hoang and Abraham Loeb has shown that Bergner and Seligman's calculation of surface temperature ignored the crucial cooling effect of evaporating H$_2$. By taking into account the cooling by H$_2$ evaporation, they found that the surface temperature of H$_2$-water ice is lower than the temperature obtained by Bergner and Seligman (2023) by a factor of 9. This means that the thermal speed of outgassing H$_2$ is decreased by a factor of 3. As a result, all H$_2$ from water ice would need to be dissociated by CRs in the interstellar medium, making Bergner and Seligman's model untenable as an explanation for the properties of 1I/`Oumuamua. Hoang and Loeb also found that the lower surface temperature influences the thermal annealing of water ice which is a key process appealed to by Bergner and Seligman (2023). The lower surface temperature means that less energy is available for thermal annealing to occur. Therefore their results suggest that alternative explanations are needed for the peculiar properties observed in 1I/`Oumuamua. This study highlights how important it is to consider all relevant physical processes when developing models to explain astronomical observations. It also demonstrates how scientific knowledge can evolve through ongoing research and refinement.
Created on 07 Apr. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.