The Brighter-Fatter Effect in the JWST MIRI Si:As IBC detectors I. Observations, impact on science, and modelling
AI-generated Key Points
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.
- The Mid-Infrared Instrument (MIRI) on the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) uses three Si:As impurity band conduction (IBC) detector arrays to record the output voltage level of each MIRI detector pixel by sampling-up-the-ramp.
- Pixel ramps become non-linear in a predictable way for uniform or low-contrast illumination, but become much more complex in areas of high contrast, known as the Brighter-Fatter Effect (BFE).
- Observational evidence of BFE is found in MIRI conventional and high-contrast coronographic imaging, low-resolution spectroscopy, and medium-resolution spectroscopy data.
- The physical mechanism behind the MIRI BFE is fundamentally different from that of CCDs and Hawaii-2RG detectors due to most photo-excited electric charges not being stored at pixels but at the input to the MIRI detector unit cell buffer amplifier capacitance.
- The resulting debiasing-induced BFE alters the electrostatic potential inside the infrared active layer, causing new photo excited electrons generated at a bright pixel to be guided towards neighboring fainter pixels.
- Debiasing induced BFE makes JWST MIRI data yield 10 - 25% larger and 0.5 - 8% brighter point sources and spectral line profiles as a function of output level covered by detector pixels.
- Profile shrinking detector depletion regions have implications for developing a pixel ramp non linearity model for point sources observed with MIRI.
- A new numerical model is presented that can be used to account for this effect when analyzing data from JWST/MIRI commissioning and Cycle 1 phase.
Authors: Ioannis Argyriou, Craig Lage, George H. Rieke, Danny Gasman, Jeroen Bouwman, Jane Morrison, Mattia Libralato, Daniel Dicken, Bernhard R. Brandl, Javier Álvarez-Márquez, Alvaro Labiano, Michael Regan, Michael E. Ressler
Abstract: The Mid-Infrared Instrument (MIRI) on board the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) uses three Si:As impurity band conduction (IBC) detector arrays. The output voltage level of each MIRI detector pixel is digitally recorded by sampling-up-the-ramp. For uniform or low-contrast illumination, the pixel ramps become non-linear in a predictable way, but in areas of high contrast, the non-linearity curve becomes much more complex. We provide observational evidence of the Brighter-Fatter Effect (BFE) in MIRI conventional and high-contrast coronographic imaging, low-resolution spectroscopy, and medium-resolution spectroscopy data and investigate the physical mechanism that gives rise to the effect on the detector pixel raw voltage integration ramps. We use public data from the JWST/MIRI commissioning and Cycle 1 phase. We also develop a numerical electrostatic model of the MIRI detectors using a modified version of the public Poisson_CCD code. The physical mechanism behind the MIRI BFE is fundamentally different to that of CCDs and Hawaii-2RG (H2RG) detectors. This is due to the largest majority of the MIRI photo-excited electric charges not being stored at the pixels but at the input to the MIRI detector unit cell buffer amplifier capacitance. The resulting detector voltage debiasing alters the electrostatic potential inside the infrared-active layer and causes new photo-excited electrons, generated at a bright pixel, to be guided to the neighboring fainter pixels. Observationally, the debiasing-induced BFE makes the JWST MIRI data yield 10-25 % larger and 0.5-8 % brighter point sources and spectral line profiles as a function of the output level covered by the detector pixels. We find that the profile of the shrinking detector depletion region has implications for developing a pixel ramp non-linearity model for point sources observed with MIRI.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.
Welcome to our AI assistant! Here are some important things to keep in mind:
- The assistant will only answer questions related to this specific paper.
- Please note that this is not a bot for casual chatting.
- If you want the answer in a language other than the language you chose for navigating the website, simply add "TRANSLATE IN LANGUAGE L" at the end of your query (replace "LANGUAGE L" with the language of your choice).
- For example, you could ask "Can you extract the most important aspect of the paper? TRANSLATE IN SPANISH".
- If you want to keep the history of your questions/answers you should create an account.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
Look for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.