Managing Cyber Risk, a Science in the Making

AI-generated keywords: Cyber Risk Cybersecurity Resilience Modeling Collaboration

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Cyber attacks have become common and the fear of these attacks is spreading rapidly
  • Michel Dacorogna and Marie Kratz wrote a paper titled "Managing Cyber Risk: A Science in the Making" to provide insight into how uncertainties surrounding cyber risks can be transformed into manageable risks
  • The paper reviews the main characteristics of cyber risk and explores the three layers of cyberspace: hardware, software, and psycho-cognitive layer
  • Managing cyber risk involves more than just technical issues; it also requires understanding human behavior and decision-making processes
  • Building a resilient society requires collaboration between various stakeholders such as policymakers, businesses, academia, and individuals to effectively address these challenges
  • Effective models for managing cyber risks need to be developed
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Michel Dacorogna, Marie Kratz

28 pages, 3 figures, 2 tables
License: CC BY-NC-ND 4.0

Abstract: Not a day goes by without news about a cyber attack. Fear spreads out and lots of wrong ideas circulate. This survey aims at showing how all these uncertainties about cyber can be transformed into manageable risk. After reviewing the main characteristics of cyber risk, we consider the three layers of cyber space: hardware, software and psycho-cognitive layer. We ask ourselves how is this risk different from others, how modelling has been tackled and needs to evolve, and what are the multi-facetted aspects of cyber risk management. This wide exploration pictures a science in the making and points out the questions to be solved for building a resilient society.

Submitted to arXiv on 05 Feb. 2023

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2303.12939v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

In today's world, cyber attacks have become a common occurrence and the fear of these attacks is spreading rapidly. To address the many misconceptions about cyber risk management, Michel Dacorogna and Marie Kratz wrote a paper titled "Managing Cyber Risk: A Science in the Making" to provide insight into how uncertainties surrounding cyber risks can be transformed into manageable risks. The paper reviews the main characteristics of cyber risk and explores the three layers of cyberspace: hardware, software, and psycho-cognitive layer. It also examines how cyber risk differs from other types of risks and how modeling has been tackled so far while highlighting areas where it needs to evolve. The authors emphasize that managing cyber risk involves more than just technical issues; it also requires understanding human behavior and decision-making processes. They discuss the multi-faceted aspects of cyber risk management and point out that building a resilient society requires collaboration between various stakeholders such as policymakers, businesses, academia, and individuals to effectively address these challenges. This paper provides an in-depth analysis of managing cyber risk as a science in the making. It highlights the importance of understanding different layers of cyberspace and developing effective models for managing cyber risks. Overall, this paper provides valuable insights into transforming uncertainties surrounding cyber risks into manageable ones by emphasizing collaboration between various stakeholders.
Created on 15 May. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.