Production Networks Resilience: Cascading Failures, Power Laws and Optimal Interventions
AI-generated Key Points
- The paper studies the resilience of supply chain networks in the face of systemic shocks that cause product suppliers to fail independently.
- Cascading failures in supply chains follow a power law distribution in random directed acyclic graphs.
- The authors define a supply chain resilience metric as the maximum magnitude shock that the production network can withstand such that at least $(1 - \varepsilon)$-fraction of the products are produced with high probability as the size of the production network grows to infinity.
- The authors present their model for why supply chain networks are prone to catastrophic failures and why a measure of resilience is needed to distinguish different supply chain architectures.
- They study various network architectures and classify them as resilient or fragile based on their ability to avoid large cascading failures almost surely.
- Networks become more resilient when multi-sourcing increases but less resilient when interdependencies among products increase.
- They provide a general computational framework for lower-bounding the proposed metric in general graphs and make additional connections to financial networks, financial contagions, centrality measures, as well as propose algorithms for optimal interventions in supply chains.
- They validate their theoretical results by empirically calculating the resilience metric and studying interventions in real-world networks.
- The paper makes several contributions including identifying topological risk factors that contribute to increased risk of cascading failures in production networks; proposing a novel theory-informed resilience metric that complements existing measures; and providing interventions for improving resilience with theoretical guarantees.
Authors: Marios Papachristou, M. Amin Rahimian
Abstract: In this paper, we study the severity of cascading failures in supply chain networks defined by a node percolation process corresponding to product suppliers failing independently due to systemic shocks. We first show that the size of the cascades follows a power law in random directed acyclic graphs, whose topology encodes the natural ordering of products from simple raw materials to complex products. This motivates the need for a supply chain resilience metric, which we define as the maximum magnitude shock that the production network can withstand such that at least $(1 - \varepsilon)$-fraction of the products are produced with high probability as the size of the production network grows to infinity. Next, we study the resilience of many network architectures and classify them as resilient, where large cascading failures can be avoided almost surely, and as fragile, where large cascades are inevitable. In the next step, we give bounds on the expected size of cascading failures in a given production network graph as the solution to a linear program and show that extending the node percolation process to a joint percolation process that affects the nodes and the links of the production network becomes a special instance of the well-studied financial contagion model of Eisenberg and Noe. We show that under certain assumptions, the Katz centrality of each node can be used as a measure of their vulnerability and give general lower bounds as well as optimal interventions for improving resilience as a function of Katz centralities. Finally, to validate our theoretical results, we empirically calculate the resilience metric and study interventions in a variety of real-world networks.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
Look for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.