GPTs are GPTs: An Early Look at the Labor Market Impact Potential of Large Language Models

Tyna Eloundou; Sam Manning; Pamela Mishkin; Daniel Rock

AI summary · arXiv: 2303.10130v4 · econ.GN

GPTs are GPTs: An Early Look at the Labor Market Impact Potential of Large Language Models

Tyna Eloundou, Sam Manning, Pamela Mishkin, Daniel Rock

Original paper Submitted to arXiv on 17 Mar. 2023 License: CC BY-SA 4.0

How to read this summary? Illustrated guide

The essentials

The paper investigates the potential implications of large language models (LLMs), specifically Generative Pre-trained Transformers (GPTs), on the US labor market.
Around 80% of the US workforce could have at least 10% of their work tasks affected by the introduction of LLMs, while approximately 19% of workers may see at least 50% of their tasks impacted.
Higher-income jobs may face greater exposure to LLM capabilities and LLM-powered software.
With access to an LLM, about 15% of all worker tasks in the US could be completed significantly faster at the same level of quality. When incorporating software and tooling built on top of LLMs, this share increases to between 47 and 56% of all tasks.
General-purpose technologies like GPTs exhibit considerable economic, social, and policy implications as they can create new types of work.
It is essential to view LLMs as versatile building blocks for creating additional tools rather than modular specialists performing specific tasks.
The study acknowledges some limitations such as its focus solely on the United States which restricts generalizability to other nations where adoption and impact may differ due to various factors such as industrial organization, technological infrastructure, regulatory frameworks, linguistic diversity, and cultural contexts.
Education programs for workers training them in skills related to automation technology; reforms to safety net programs; and other measures are needed in order to shape a future economy with increasingly widespread adoption of large language models (LLMs).

Key points written by AI: they may contain errors, check them against the paper.

AI-generated keywords: LLMs GPTs Automation US Labor Market Implications

Read further

Comprehensive Summary
Layman's Summary
Blog article
Original abstract

This working paper investigates the potential implications of large language models (LLMs), specifically Generative Pre-trained Transformers (GPTs), on the US labor market. The study focuses on the increased capabilities arising from LLM-powered software compared to LLMs on their own, and assesses occupations based on their alignment with LLM capabilities using a new rubric that integrates both human expertise and GPT-4 classifications. The findings reveal that around 80% of the US workforce could have at least 10% of their work tasks affected by the introduction of LLMs, while approximately 19% of workers may see at least 50% of their tasks impacted. These impacts are not restricted to industries with higher recent productivity growth, and higher-income jobs may face greater exposure to LLM capabilities and LLM-powered software. The analysis suggests that with access to an LLM, about 15% of all worker tasks in the US could be completed significantly faster at the same level of quality. When incorporating software and tooling built on top of LLMs, this share increases to between 47 and 56% of all tasks. This finding implies that LLM-powered software will have a substantial effect on scaling the economic impacts of the underlying models. The paper also discusses how general-purpose technologies like GPTs exhibit considerable economic, social, and policy implications as they can create new types of work. However, it is essential to view LLMs as versatile building blocks for creating additional tools rather than modular specialists performing specific tasks. The study acknowledges some limitations such as its focus solely on the United States which restricts generalizability to other nations where adoption and impact may differ due to various factors such as industrial organization, technological infrastructure, regulatory frameworks, linguistic diversity, and cultural contexts. Overall, this research provides insights into how LLM adoption may affect different occupations in terms of task automation potential in various industries across the US labor market. The study highlights the need for policy-related directions such as education programs for workers training them in skills related to automation technology; reforms to safety net programs; and other measures in order to shape a future economy with increasingly widespread adoption of large language models (LLMs).

The Potential Implications of Large Language Models (LLMs) on the US Labor Market

In recent years, large language models (LLMs) such as Generative Pre-trained Transformers (GPTs) have become increasingly popular due to their ability to generate natural language. This has led to a surge in research into the potential implications of LLM adoption on the US labor market. A new working paper by researchers at Stanford University investigates this topic and provides insights into how LLM adoption may affect different occupations in terms of task automation potential across various industries.

Background

Large language models are powerful tools that can be used for a variety of tasks, including text generation, summarization, translation, question answering, and more. GPTs are particularly noteworthy because they have been shown to generate human-like text with minimal training data and can be used for many applications without requiring additional fine-tuning or customization. As such, these models have the potential to significantly reduce costs associated with manual labor while increasing productivity and efficiency across a range of industries.

Study Overview

The study focuses on the increased capabilities arising from LLM-powered software compared to LLMs on their own and assesses occupations based on their alignment with LLM capabilities using a new rubric that integrates both human expertise and GPT-4 classifications. The analysis suggests that with access to an LLM, about 15% of all worker tasks in the US could be completed significantly faster at the same level of quality; when incorporating software and tooling built on top of LLMs, this share increases to between 47 and 56% of all tasks. These impacts are not restricted to industries with higher recent productivity growth; rather, higher-income jobs may face greater exposure due to their reliance upon complex cognitive skills which are more easily automated by AI technologies like GPTs than lower income jobs which rely more heavily upon physical labor or interpersonal interactions which cannot yet be replicated by machines alone.

Findings

The findings reveal that around 80% of the US workforce could have at least 10% of their work tasks affected by the introduction of LLMs while approximately 19% may see at least 50% impacted. Furthermore, general purpose technologies like GPTs exhibit considerable economic social and policy implications as they can create new types of work but it is essential for policymakers view them as versatile building blocks for creating additional tools rather than modular specialists performing specific tasks .

Limitations & Policy Implications

The study acknowledges some limitations such as its focus solely on the United States which restricts generalizability to other nations where adoption and impact may differ due to various factors such as industrial organization technological infrastructure regulatory frameworks linguistic diversity cultural contexts etc . Despite these limitations , overall this research provides valuable insights into how large language models may shape future economies . To ensure equitable outcomes , policy makers should consider implementing education programs for workers training them in skills related automation technology ; reforms safety net programs ; other measures order shape future economy increasingly widespread adoption large language models .

Created on 01 May. 2023

Was this synthesis useful?

Score: 0

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

How to chat with this paper? Illustrated guide

Compare with the PDF

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

AI assistant instructions?

Tools for this paper

Explain it differently 1 free rewrite left today

Save to a collection Group papers in collections to compare them, chat with them and export them. Continue with Google Create a free account Log in

Export BibTeX · RIS (Zotero, Mendeley, EndNote) · Obsidian (Markdown) · Notion (Markdown) · Guides: Obsidian, Notion

Advanced tools Premium

For researchers who follow a field closely: citation alerts, journal-club slides, version comparison and Zotero export. Discover Premium

Zotero Zotero guide

Citation alerts Citation alerts guide

Who works on it? The people and institutions who publish on its topic

Journal club Premium+ Slides to present it Propose for the journal club Journal club guide

Versions What changed between versions Versions guide

Talk about it in public Premium+ Press kit: release, questions, hype check Press kit guide

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.

GPTs are GPTs: An Early Look at the Labor Market Impact Potential of Large Language Models

The essentials

Read further

Definitions

The Potential Implications of Large Language Models (LLMs) on the US Labor Market

Background

Study Overview

Findings

Limitations & Policy Implications

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

Tools for this paper

Advanced tools Premium

Papers around this one

Closest papers

Prior work it builds on

Papers that cite it

Go further

Cite this paper (BibTeX)