Using 3D printed badges to improve student performance and reduce dropout rates in STEM higher education

AI-generated keywords: Badges Gamification STEM Education Student Performance Dropout Rates

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • STEM students often find their courses difficult, leading to decreased motivation and performance
  • Gamification techniques, such as badges, can promote engagement, motivation, and fun in learning
  • Physical and virtual badges can improve student performance and reduce dropout rates
  • A case study with 99 students in a Databases course showed that badge usage led to improved student performance and reduced dropout rates
  • Negligible differences were found between different types of badges used
  • Incorporating badge systems into STEM education can positively impact student outcomes
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Raúl Lara-Cabrera, Fernando Ortega, Edgar Talavera, Daniel López-Fernández

Abstract: Students' perception of excessive difficulty in STEM degrees lowers their motivation and therefore affects their performance. According to prior research, the use of gamification techniques promote engagement, motivation and fun when learning. Badges, which are a distinction that is given as a reward to students, are a well-known gamification tool. This contribution hypothesizes that the use of badges, both physical and virtual, improves student performance and reduces dropout rates. To verify that hypothesis, a case study involving 99 students enrolled in a Databases course of computer science degrees was conducted. The results show that the usage of badges improves student performance and reduces dropout rates. However, negligible differences were found between the use of different kind of badges.

Submitted to arXiv on 15 Mar. 2023

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2303.08939v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

In STEM higher education, students often perceive the difficulty of their courses as excessive, leading to decreased motivation and performance. To address this issue, prior research has suggested the use of gamification techniques to promote engagement, motivation, and fun in learning. One such technique is the use of badges as a reward for student achievement. This study hypothesizes that the implementation of both physical and virtual badges can improve student performance and reduce dropout rates. To test this hypothesis, a case study was conducted with 99 students enrolled in a Databases course within computer science degrees. The results show that the usage of badges does indeed lead to improved student performance and reduced dropout rates. However, there were negligible differences found between different types of badges used. This study suggests that incorporating badge systems into STEM education can positively impact student outcomes and should be considered by educators seeking to improve student engagement and success in challenging courses.
Created on 25 Mar. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.