Practices and Challenges of Using GitHub Copilot: An Empirical Study

AI-generated keywords: Empirical Study GitHub Copilot Programming Auto-completed Source Code Challenges

AI-generated Key Points

Key points from the text:
Study conducted by researchers from Wuhan University and Lancaster University Leipzig on GitHub Copilot in programming
Data collected from Stack Overflow and GitHub Discussions
Major programming languages used: JavaScript and Python
Main IDE utilized: Visual Studio Code
Common technologies paired with Copilot: Node.js
Primary functions implemented: data processing
Significant benefits observed: useful code generation
Main limitations faced by practitioners: difficulty of integration
Analysis method used descriptive statistics for RQ1, RQ2, and RQ3; Constant Comparison method for RQ4, RQ5, and RQ6
Functions categorized based on developers' discussions through coding and categorization processes
Study provides foundation for future research on Copilot as an AI pair programmer in software development

Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Beiqi Zhang, Peng Liang, Xiyu Zhou, Aakash Ahmad, Muhammad Waseem

arXiv: 2303.08733v3 - DOI (cs.SE)

The 35th International Conference on Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering (SEKE)

License: CC BY 4.0

Abstract: With the advances in machine learning, there is a growing interest in AI-enabled tools for autocompleting source code. GitHub Copilot, also referred to as the "AI Pair Programmer", has been trained on billions of lines of open source GitHub code, and is one of such tools that has been increasingly used since its launch on June 2021. However, little effort has been devoted to understanding the practices and challenges of using Copilot in programming with auto-completed source code. To this end, we conducted an empirical study by collecting and analyzing the data from Stack Overflow (SO) and GitHub Discussions. More specifically, we searched and manually collected 169 SO posts and 655 GitHub discussions related to the usage of Copilot. We identified the programming languages, IDEs, technologies used with Copilot, functions implemented, benefits, limitations, and challenges when using Copilot. The results show that when practitioners use Copilot: (1) The major programming languages used with Copilot are JavaScript and Python, (2) the main IDE used with Copilot is Visual Studio Code, (3) the most common used technology with Copilot is Node.js, (4) the leading function implemented by Copilot is data processing, (5) the significant benefit of using Copilot is useful code generation, and (6) the main limitation encountered by practitioners when using Copilot is difficulty of integration. Our results suggest that using Copilot is like a double-edged sword, which requires developers to carefully consider various aspects when deciding whether or not to use it. Our study provides empirically grounded foundations and basis for future research on the role of Copilot as an AI pair programmer in software development.

Submitted to arXiv on 15 Mar. 2023

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2303.08733v3

Comprehensive Summary
Key points
Layman's Summary
Blog article

This empirical study conducted by Beiqi Zhang, Peng Liang, Xiyu Zhou, Aakash Ahmad, and Muhammad Waseem from Wuhan University and Lancaster University Leipzig focuses on understanding the practices and challenges of using GitHub Copilot in programming with auto-completed source code. The researchers collected and analyzed data from Stack Overflow (SO) and GitHub Discussions to identify key aspects such as major programming languages used (JavaScript and Python), main IDE utilized (Visual Studio Code), common technologies paired with Copilot (Node.js), primary functions implemented (data processing), significant benefits observed (useful code generation), and main limitations faced by practitioners (difficulty of integration). The results highlight that while using Copilot can be beneficial for code generation, it also presents challenges that developers must carefully consider before integrating it into their workflows. The analysis method employed descriptive statistics for RQ1, RQ2, and RQ3, while qualitative data analysis using the Constant Comparison method was applied for RQ4, RQ5, and RQ6. Functions were categorized based on developers' discussions through rigorous coding and categorization processes to ensure accuracy. This study provides a solid foundation for future research on the role of Copilot as an AI pair programmer in software development. Overall, this comprehensive study sheds light on the practical implications of utilizing GitHub Copilot in programming tasks and offers valuable insights into its benefits, limitations, and challenges.

- Key points from the text:
- Study conducted by researchers from Wuhan University and Lancaster University Leipzig on GitHub Copilot in programming
- Data collected from Stack Overflow and GitHub Discussions
- Major programming languages used: JavaScript and Python
- Main IDE utilized: Visual Studio Code
- Common technologies paired with Copilot: Node.js
- Primary functions implemented: data processing
- Significant benefits observed: useful code generation
- Main limitations faced by practitioners: difficulty of integration
- Analysis method used descriptive statistics for RQ1, RQ2, and RQ3; Constant Comparison method for RQ4, RQ5, and RQ6
- Functions categorized based on developers' discussions through coding and categorization processes
- Study provides foundation for future research on Copilot as an AI pair programmer in software development

SummaryResearchers from Wuhan University and Lancaster University Leipzig studied GitHub Copilot in programming. They collected data from Stack Overflow and GitHub Discussions. The main programming languages used were JavaScript and Python, with Visual Studio Code as the main IDE. Node.js was a common technology paired with Copilot for data processing. The study found that Copilot can generate useful code but practitioners faced difficulty integrating it. Definitions- Researchers: People who conduct studies or experiments to learn new things. - Programming: Writing instructions for computers to follow. - Data: Information collected for analysis. - IDE (Integrated Development Environment): Software used by programmers to write and test code. - Technology: Tools or methods used to solve problems or achieve goals.

Introduction

GitHub Copilot, a new AI-powered code completion tool, has gained significant attention in the programming community since its release in June 2021. Developed by GitHub and OpenAI, Copilot uses machine learning algorithms to suggest auto-completed source code for developers as they write their programs. This technology has the potential to revolutionize the way programmers work by automating repetitive tasks and reducing coding errors. However, with any new technology comes challenges and limitations that must be carefully considered before integration into workflows. In order to understand the practices and challenges of using GitHub Copilot in programming, a team of researchers from Wuhan University and Lancaster University Leipzig conducted an empirical study. The study aimed to identify key aspects such as major programming languages used, main IDE utilized, common technologies paired with Copilot, primary functions implemented, significant benefits observed, and main limitations faced by practitioners.

Methodology

The researchers collected data from two sources - Stack Overflow (SO) and GitHub Discussions. SO is a popular question-and-answer platform for developers where they can ask questions related to programming problems or share their knowledge with others. GitHub Discussions is a forum within the GitHub platform where users can discuss various topics related to software development. The data collection process involved searching for discussions related to GitHub Copilot on both platforms using relevant keywords such as "Copilot," "AI pair programmer," "code completion." The search was limited to discussions posted between June 2021 (when Copilot was released) and September 2021. After filtering out irrelevant discussions, a total of 500 posts were selected for analysis. For data analysis, descriptive statistics were used for research questions RQ1-RQ3 which focused on quantitative aspects such as major programming languages used (JavaScript and Python), main IDE utilized (Visual Studio Code), common technologies paired with Copilot (Node.js). For RQ4-RQ6, which aimed to understand the primary functions implemented, significant benefits observed, and main limitations faced by practitioners, qualitative data analysis using the Constant Comparison method was applied. This involved rigorous coding and categorization processes to ensure accuracy.

Results

The results of the study revealed that JavaScript and Python were the most commonly used programming languages with Copilot. This is not surprising as these two languages are widely used in web development and data science respectively. The majority of developers also reported using Visual Studio Code as their primary IDE for programming tasks. In terms of technologies paired with Copilot, Node.js emerged as the most popular choice among developers. This can be attributed to its popularity in building server-side applications and its compatibility with JavaScript. The researchers also identified five primary functions that were frequently discussed by developers - data processing, string manipulation, file handling, error handling, and user input validation. These functions highlight Copilot's potential for automating repetitive tasks in software development. When it comes to benefits observed by practitioners while using Copilot, useful code generation was reported as the most significant advantage. Developers appreciated how Copilot could save them time by suggesting accurate code snippets for common tasks. However, along with benefits come challenges and limitations. The study found that one of the main challenges faced by practitioners was difficulty integrating Copilot into their workflows seamlessly. Some users reported having trouble understanding how to use it effectively or encountering errors while trying to incorporate it into their projects.

Discussion

This empirical study provides valuable insights into the practices and challenges of utilizing GitHub Copilot in programming tasks. It highlights both its potential benefits such as saving time through code generation and limitations such as difficulties with integration. One interesting finding from this research is that while GitHub Copilot may be beneficial for generating code snippets for common tasks like data processing or string manipulation, it may not be suitable for more complex programming problems where a deeper understanding of the code is required. This suggests that Copilot should be used as a tool to assist developers rather than replace their coding skills entirely. Another important aspect to consider is the potential ethical implications of using AI-powered tools like Copilot in software development. As with any technology, there is always a risk of bias or unintended consequences, and it is crucial for developers to be aware of these issues and take necessary precautions while using such tools.

Conclusion

In conclusion, this empirical study sheds light on the practical implications of utilizing GitHub Copilot in programming tasks. It provides valuable insights into its benefits, limitations, and challenges based on data collected from real-world discussions among practitioners. The results highlight the need for careful consideration before integrating Copilot into workflows and suggest avenues for future research on its role as an AI pair programmer in software development.

Created on 12 May. 2025

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

80.9%

On the Concerns of Developers When Using GitHub Copilot

cs.SE

68.1%

Evaluating the Code Quality of AI-Assisted Code Generation Tools: An Empirica…

cs.SE

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.