On the Concerns of Developers When Using GitHub Copilot
AI-generated Key Points
- Researchers aimed to understand issues and challenges faced by software developers when using GitHub Copilot
- Data was collected from 476 GitHub issues, 706 GitHub discussions, and 184 Stack Overflow posts
- Usage Issue and Compatibility Issue were the most common problems encountered by users
- Main causes of these issues were identified as Copilot Internal Issue, Network Connection Issue, and Editor/IDE Compatibility Issue
- Predominant solutions included Bug Fixed by Copilot, Modify Configuration/Setting, and Use Suitable Version
- Researchers established a set of data items for extraction and conducted pilot data extraction on a sample of GitHub issues, discussions, and Stack Overflow posts
- Standards for data extraction were established to ensure accuracy and consistency
- Extracted data items were analyzed using the Constant Comparison method to identify patterns and themes among codes assigned to each item
- Study provides insights into challenges faced by developers when using Copilot in practical development scenarios
- Highlights areas where Copilot can be improved and suggests potential new features desired by users
Authors: Xiyu Zhou, Peng Liang, Beiqi Zhang, Zengyang Li, Aakash Ahmad, Mojtaba Shahin, Muhammad Waseem
Abstract: With the recent advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and the emergence of Large Language Models (LLMs), AI-based code generation tools have achieved significant progress and become a practical solution for software development. GitHub Copilot, referred to as AI pair programmer, utilizes machine learning models that are trained on a large corpus of code snippets to generate code suggestions or auto-complete code using natural language processing. Despite its popularity, there is little empirical evidence on the actual experiences of software developers who work with Copilot. To this end, we conducted an empirical study to understand the issues and challenges that developers face when using Copilot in practice, as well as their underlying causes and potential solutions. We collected data from 476 GitHub issues, 706 GitHub discussions, and 184 Stack Overflow posts, and identified the issues, causes that trigger the issues, and solutions that resolve the issues when using Copilot. Our results reveal that (1) Usage Issue and Compatibility Issue are the most common problems faced by Copilot users, (2) Copilot Internal Issue, Network Connection Issue, and Editor/IDE Compatibility Issue are identified as the most frequent causes, and (3) Bug Fixed by Copilot, Modify Configuration/Setting, and Use Suitable Version are the predominant solutions. Based on the results, we delve into the main challenges users encounter when implementing Copilot in practical development, the possible impact of Copilot on the coding process, aspects in which Copilot can be further enhanced, and potential new features desired by Copilot users.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Score: 0
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.