Subjective and Objective Quality Assessment for in-the-Wild Computer Graphics Images
AI-generated Key Points
- Computer graphics images (CGIs) are widely used in various scenarios such as games and streaming media.
- The quality of CGIs often suffers from poor rendering during production and compression artifacts during transmission.
- Few works have been dedicated to addressing computer graphics image quality assessment (CGIQA).
- Most image quality assessment (IQA) metrics are developed for natural scene images (NSIs) and validated on databases consisting of NSIs with synthetic distortions, which are not suitable for in-the-wild CGIs.
- To bridge the gap between evaluating the quality of NSIs and CGIs, this paper proposes a large-scale in-the-wild CGIQA database consisting of 6,000 CGIs called CGIQA-6k.
- The proposed model takes advantage of inter-channel information from low-level to high-level since CGIs have apparent patterns as well as rich interactive semantic content.
- The experimental results show that the proposed method outperforms all other state-of-the-art NR IQA methods on the constructed CGIQA-6k database and other CGIQA related databases.
- The major contributions of this work include constructing the largest in-the wild CGIQA database with subjective quality scores covering a wider range of resolutions and diverse content along with proposing an effective deep learning based NR IQA model through multi stage feature fusion and multi stage channel attention mechanisms.
- The database along with code will be released to facilitate further research in this area.
Authors: Zicheng Zhang, Wei Sun, Tao Wang, Wei Lu, Quan Zhou, Jun he, Qiyuan Wang, Xiongkuo Min, Guangtao Zhai
Abstract: Computer graphics images (CGIs) are artificially generated by means of computer programs and are widely perceived under various scenarios, such as games, streaming media, etc. In practical, the quality of CGIs consistently suffers from poor rendering during the production and inevitable compression artifacts during the transmission of multimedia applications. However, few works have been dedicated to dealing with the challenge of computer graphics images quality assessment (CGIQA). Most image quality assessment (IQA) metrics are developed for natural scene images (NSIs) and validated on the databases consisting of NSIs with synthetic distortions, which are not suitable for in-the-wild CGIs. To bridge the gap between evaluating the quality of NSIs and CGIs, we construct a large-scale in-the-wild CGIQA database consisting of 6,000 CGIs (CGIQA-6k) and carry out the subjective experiment in a well-controlled laboratory environment to obtain the accurate perceptual ratings of the CGIs. Then, we propose an effective deep learning-based no-reference (NR) IQA model by utilizing multi-stage feature fusion strategy and multi-stage channel attention mechanism. The major motivation of the proposed model is to make full use of inter-channel information from low-level to high-level since CGIs have apparent patterns as well as rich interactive semantic content. Experimental results show that the proposed method outperforms all other state-of-the-art NR IQA methods on the constructed CGIQA-6k database and other CGIQA-related databases. The database along with the code will be released to facilitate further research.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
Welcome to our AI assistant! Here are some important things to keep in mind:
- The assistant will only answer questions related to this specific paper.
- Please note that this is not a bot for casual chatting.
- If you want the answer in a language other than the language you chose for navigating the website, simply add "TRANSLATE IN LANGUAGE L" at the end of your query (replace "LANGUAGE L" with the language of your choice).
- For example, you could ask "Can you extract the most important aspect of the paper? TRANSLATE IN SPANISH".
- If you want to keep the history of your questions/answers you should create an account.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through atree representation
Look for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.