Quantification of cervical elasticity during pregnancy based on transvaginal ultrasound imaging and stress measurement
AI-generated Key Points
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.
- The study aimed to develop a quantitative cervical elastography system that overcomes the limitations of strain and shear wave elastography methods in measuring cervical elasticity.
- A stress sensor was added to a transvaginal ultrasound imaging system to record B-mode images of the cervix showing its deformation and probe-surface stress simultaneously.
- An automatic feature tracking algorithm was developed to quantify the deformation and obtain strain measurements.
- By applying linear regression to the stress and strain data, an approximation of the cervical Young's modulus was obtained.
- The accuracy and robustness of this new elastography system were validated using phantom experiments.
- The researchers applied this system to pregnant participants and observed significant softening of the cervix during pregnancy, with the cervical Young's modulus decreasing by 3.95% per week (p-value < 0.001).
- Geometric mean values of cervical Young's moduli during the first (11 to 13 weeks), second, and third trimesters were estimated as 13.07 kPa, 7.59 kPa, and 4.40 kPa, respectively.
- This new quantitative cervical elastography system provides a more accurate method for measuring cervical elasticity during pregnancy compared to existing methods such as strain or shear wave elastography.
- It has potential applications in monitoring high-risk pregnancies where premature labor is a concern as changes in cervical elasticity are indicative of preterm birth risk.
Authors: Peng Hu, Peinan Zhao, Yuan Qu, Konstantin Maslov, Jessica Chubiz, Methodius G. Tuuli, Molly J. Stout, Lihong V. Wang
Abstract: Objective: Strain elastography and shear wave elastography are two commonly used methods to quantify cervical elasticity; however, they have limitations. Strain elastography is effective in showing tissue elasticity distribution in a single image, but the absence of stress information causes difficulty in comparing the results acquired from different imaging sessions. Shear wave elastography is effective in measuring shear wave speed (an intrinsic tissue property correlated with elasticity) in relatively homogeneous tissue, such as in the liver. However, for inhomogeneous tissue in the cervix, the shear wave speed measurement is less robust. To overcome these limitations, we develop a quantitative cervical elastography system by adding a stress sensor to an ultrasound imaging system. Methods: In an imaging session for quantitative cervical elastography, we use the transvaginal ultrasound imaging system to record B-mode images of the cervix showing its deformation and use the stress sensor to record the probe-surface stress simultaneously. We develop a correlation-based automatic feature tracking algorithm to quantify the deformation, from which the strain is quantified. After each imaging session, we calibrate the stress sensor and transform its measurement to true stress. Applying a linear regression to the stress and strain, we obtain an approximation of the cervical Young's modulus. Results: We validate the accuracy and robustness of this elastography system using phantom experiments. Applying this system to pregnant participants, we observe significant softening of the cervix during pregnancy (p-value < 0.001) with the cervical Young's modulus decreasing 3.95% per week. We estimate that geometric mean values of cervical Young's moduli during the first (11 to 13 weeks), second, and third trimesters are 13.07 kPa, 7.59 kPa, and 4.40 kPa, respectively.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Score: 0
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.