Employee attrition is a major challenge for organizations as it can directly impact their competitiveness and performance. The cost and time required to attract and retain talented employees make it crucial for businesses to increase employee retention rates. Machine learning (ML) has been applied in various aspects of human resource management, including attrition prediction, to provide insights on proactive measures that can be taken to prevent talented employees from quitting. However, the best-performing ML methods, such as ensemble or deep neural networks, are black box techniques that cannot be easily interpreted. To address this issue, several explainability frameworks have been proposed, including counterfactual explanation methods that can explain and recommend actions to obtain the desired outcome. However, current counterfactual explanations methods focus on optimizing changes made on individual cases to achieve the desired outcome. In contrast, in the case of employee attrition prevention, it is important to identify the optimum interventions that an organization needs to make to its practices/policies to prevent or minimize attrition probability for a group of employees. In this paper, the authors propose a new method utilizing counterfactual explanations focusing on multiple attrition cases from historical data. This method identifies specific business policy changes that can revert attrition of specific employees by providing actionable recommendations based on multiple instances rather than individual employees who left the company. This approach provides comprehensive HR policies that predict turnover intention and reduces negative effects on business performance and competitiveness. The proposed method goes beyond other interpretable ML methods such as SHAP by providing specific policy changes optimized on multiple instances (e.g., employees in a particular department whose skills cannot easily be replenished). It explains what management needs to do to prevent attrition of these employees by providing actionable business recommendations. Overall, this work highlights the importance of using multiple instances when generating recommendations for preventing employee attrition rather than relying solely on individual cases. Future work will focus on providing weights to features manipulated so that the method can provide ranked recommendations based on how easy they can be implemented. The method will also be extended to eliminate automatically infeasible solutions by enabling the user to provide a range of feasible feature values and comparing results with similar work under different scenarios.
- - Employee attrition can negatively impact an organization's competitiveness and performance
- - Machine learning has been used to predict employee attrition and suggest proactive measures
- - However, the best-performing ML methods are black box techniques that cannot be easily interpreted
- - Counterfactual explanation methods have been proposed to address this issue, but current methods focus on individual cases rather than groups of employees
- - The authors propose a new method utilizing counterfactual explanations focusing on multiple attrition cases from historical data to identify specific business policy changes that can revert attrition of specific employees by providing actionable recommendations based on multiple instances rather than individual employees who left the company.
- - This approach provides comprehensive HR policies that predict turnover intention and reduces negative effects on business performance and competitiveness.
- - The proposed method goes beyond other interpretable ML methods such as SHAP by providing specific policy changes optimized on multiple instances.
- - Future work will focus on providing weights to features manipulated so that the method can provide ranked recommendations based on how easy they can be implemented.
Summary: Sometimes when employees leave a company, it can make the company not do as well. People have made computers that can predict when employees might leave and suggest ways to stop it from happening. But some of these computer methods are hard to understand. Some people have come up with a new way to use the computer to help with this problem, but they need to work on making it better.
Definitions- Employee attrition: When employees leave a company.
- Machine learning: When computers learn how to do things without being specifically programmed for each step.
- Black box techniques: Computer methods that are hard for people to understand.
- Counterfactual explanation methods: Ways of explaining why something happened by imagining what would have happened if things were different.
- Business policy changes: Changes in how a company does things.
- HR policies: Rules and guidelines about how a company treats its employees.
- Turnover intention: When an employee plans on leaving their job soon.
- Competitiveness: How well a company is doing compared to other companies in the same field or industry.
- SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations): A specific method used in machine learning for understanding which features of data are most important in making predictions.
Understanding Employee Attrition and How Machine Learning Can Help
Employee attrition is a major challenge for organizations, as it can have a direct impact on their competitiveness and performance. The cost and time required to attract and retain talented employees make it crucial for businesses to increase employee retention rates. To do this, many companies are turning to machine learning (ML) techniques in order to gain insights into proactive measures that can be taken to prevent talented employees from quitting.
The Limitations of ML Techniques
While ML has been successful in providing insights into employee attrition prevention, the best-performing methods such as ensemble or deep neural networks are black box techniques that cannot be easily interpreted. This means that while these methods may provide accurate predictions about which employees are likely to leave an organization, they cannot explain why those particular individuals might be at risk of leaving or what measures should be taken by the organization in order to prevent them from doing so.
Explainability Frameworks: Counterfactual Explanations
In order to address this issue, several explainability frameworks have been proposed including counterfactual explanation methods which can explain and recommend actions that need to be taken in order to obtain the desired outcome. However, current counterfactual explanations methods focus on optimizing changes made on individual cases rather than groups of people who may share similar characteristics or experiences within an organization.
A New Method Utilizing Counterfactual Explanations Focusing on Multiple Attrition Cases
In response to this limitation, researchers have recently developed a new method utilizing counterfactual explanations focusing on multiple attrition cases from historical data. This approach identifies specific business policy changes that can revert attrition of specific employees by providing actionable recommendations based on multiple instances rather than individual cases who left the company. As such, it provides comprehensive HR policies that predict turnover intention and reduces negative effects on business performance and competitiveness.
How Does It Work?
This method goes beyond other interpretable ML methods such as SHAP by providing specific policy changes optimized on multiple instances (e.g., employees in a particular department whose skills cannot easily be replenished). In other words, it explains what management needs to do in order to prevent attrition of these employees by providing actionable business recommendations tailored specifically for each group of people with similar characteristics or experiences within an organization rather than relying solely upon individual cases who left the company previously..
Future Directions
Future work will focus on providing weights to features manipulated so that the method can provide ranked recommendations based on how easy they can be implemented. The method will also be extended further so as eliminate automatically infeasible solutions by enabling users provide a range of feasible feature values and comparing results with similar work under different scenarios .
Conclusion
Overall , this research paper highlights the importance of using multiple instances when generating recommendations for preventing employee attrition rather than relying solely upon individual cases . By leveraging counterfactual explanations focused upon multiple instances , organizations now have access not only more accurate predictions but also actionable advice tailored specifically towards their own unique circumstances . With further development , this technique could become invaluable tool for any HR team looking maximize retention rates amongst its workforce .