Where intermediate-mass black holes could hide in the Galactic Centre: A full parameter study with the S2 orbit
AI-generated Key Points
- The Galactic Center (GC) of the Milky Way contains a massive black hole, SgrA*, and a compact nuclear star cluster with fast-moving young stars called S-stars
- Current star formation models cannot easily explain the presence and location of these stars, leading to the suggestion that an intermediate-mass black hole (IMBH) could be present in the GC
- Researchers used GRAVITY astrometric and SINFONI, KECK, and GNIRS spectroscopic data of S2 to investigate whether a second massive object could exist deep in the GC in the form of an IMBH binary companion to SgrA*
- They explored two types of settings: a hierarchical set-up where the star S2 orbits the SgrA*-IMBH binary and a non-hierarchical set-up where the IMBH trajectory lies outside the S2 orbit
- For the hierarchical case, IMBH masses greater than 2000 Msun on orbits with smaller semi-major axes than S2 were largely excluded. In contrast, for the non-hierarchical case, there were several pockets of valid IMBH solutions within the parameter space.
- However, further analysis revealed that IMBHs on semi-major axes larger than S2 tended to disrupt the resident star cluster in less than one million years.
- The current data did not formally require an IMBH's presence; if one existed in GC, it would have to be either a low mass IMBH inside the S2 orbit that moves on a short and significantly inclined trajectory or an IMBH with a semi major axis greater than 1".
- The researchers provided parameter maps of valid IMBH solutions in GC and discussed their general structure.
- They concluded that while an IMBH could potentially exist in GC, it would have to be on a specific trajectory to avoid disrupting its surrounding star cluster.
- The study highlights how important it is to understand dynamics when dealing with moving masses in GC as well as provides insights into potential future research directions.
Authors: The GRAVITY Collaboration, O. Straub, M. Bauböck, R. Abuter, N. Aimar, P. Amaro Seoane, A. Amorim, J. P. Berger, H. Bonnet, G. Bourdarot, W. Brandner, V. Cardoso, Y. Clénet, Y. Dallilar, R. Davies, P. T. de Zeeuw, J. Dexter, A. Drescher, F. Eisenhauer, N. M. Förster Schreiber, A. Foschi, P. Garcia, F. Gao, E. Gendron, R. Genzel, S. Gillessen, M. Habibi, X. Haubois, G. Heißel, T. Henning, S. Hippler, M. Horrobin, L. Jochum, L. Jocou, A. Kaufer, P. Kervella, S. Lacour, V. Lapeyrère, J. -B. Le Bouquin, P. Léna, D. Lutz, T. Ott, T. Paumard, K. Perraut, G. Perrin, O. Pfuhl, S. Rabien, D. C. Ribeiro, M. Sadun Bordoni, S. Scheithauer, J. Shangguan, T. Shimizu, J. Stadler, C. Straubmeier, E. Sturm, L. J. Tacconi, F. Vincent, S. von Fellenberg, F. Widmann, E. Wieprecht, E. Wiezorrek, J. Woillez, S. Yazici
Abstract: In the Milky Way the central massive black hole, SgrA*, coexists with a compact nuclear star cluster that contains a sub-parsec concentration of fast-moving young stars called S-stars. Their location and age are not easily explained by current star formation models, and in several scenarios the presence of an intermediate-mass black hole (IMBH) has been invoked. We use GRAVITY astrometric and SINFONI, KECK, and GNIRS spectroscopic data of S2 to investigate whether a second massive object could be present deep in the Galactic Centre (GC) in the form of an IMBH binary companion to SgrA*. To solve the three-body problem, we used a post-Newtonian framework and consider two types of settings: (i) a hierarchical set-up where the star S2 orbits the SgrA* - IMBH binary and (ii) a non-hierarchical set-up where the IMBH trajectory lies outside the S2 orbit. In both cases we explore the full 20-dimensional parameter space by employing a Bayesian dynamic nested sampling method. For the hierarchical case we find: IMBH masses > 2000 Msun on orbits with smaller semi-major axes than S2 are largely excluded. For the non-hierarchical case the parameter space contains several pockets of valid IMBH solutions. However, a closer analysis of their impact on the resident stars reveals that IMBHs on semi-major axes larger than S2 tend to disrupt the S-star cluster in less than a million years. This makes the existence of an IMBH among the S-stars highly unlikely. The current S2 data do not formally require the presence of an IMBH. If an IMBH hides in the GC, it has to be either a low-mass IMBH inside the S2 orbit that moves on a short and significantly inclined trajectory or an IMBH with a semi-major axis >1". We provide the parameter maps of valid IMBH solutions in the GC and discuss the general structure of our results. (abridged)
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
Welcome to our AI assistant! Here are some important things to keep in mind:
- The assistant will only answer questions related to this specific paper.
- Please note that this is not a bot for casual chatting.
- If you want the answer in a language other than the language you chose for navigating the website, simply add "TRANSLATE IN LANGUAGE L" at the end of your query (replace "LANGUAGE L" with the language of your choice).
- For example, you could ask "Can you extract the most important aspect of the paper? TRANSLATE IN SPANISH".
- If you want to keep the history of your questions/answers you should create an account.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through atree representation
Look for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.