## Completeness for categories of generalized automata

### AI-generated Key Points

- The paper presents a proof of completeness and cocompleteness for categories of generalized automata, specifically F-automata.
- In traditional deterministic automata theory, the span of maps E ← E ⊗ I → O is used to define an automaton with input I and output O in a monoidal category (K,⊗).
- The authors replace this span with a more general one: E ← F E → O, where F is a generic endofunctor of a generic category K.
- These generalized automata exist in both Mealy and Moore versions and form categories F-Mly and F-Mre.
- The authors show that these categories can be presented as strict 2-pullbacks in Cat (the category of small categories) and that when F is a left adjoint, both F-Mly and F-Mre admit all limits and colimits that K admits.
- The main results are mechanized using the proof assistant Agda and the library agda-categories.
- The paper also provides some context on related topics such as automata extensions, formal languages and automata theory, coalgebras, and cocomplete categories.
- Funding sources for one of the authors are disclosed.

**Authors:**
Guido Boccali,
Andrea Laretto,
Fosco Loregian,
Stefano Luneia

**Abstract:** We present a slick proof of completeness and cocompleteness for categories of $F$-automata, where the span of maps $E\leftarrow E\otimes I \to O$ that usually defines a deterministic automaton of input $I$ and output $O$ in a monoidal category $(\mathcal K,\otimes)$ is replaced by a span $E\leftarrow F E \to O$ for a generic endofunctor $F : \mathcal K\to \mathcal K$ of a generic category $\mathcal K$: these automata exist in their `Mealy' and `Moore' version and form categories $F\text{-}\mathsf{Mly}$ and $F\text{-}\mathsf{Mre}$; such categories can be presented as strict 2-pullbacks in $\mathsf{Cat}$ and whenever $F$ is a left adjoint, both $F\text{-}\mathsf{Mly}$ and $F\text{-}\mathsf{Mre}$ admit all limits and colimits that $\mathcal K$ admits. We mechanize some of of our main results using the proof assistant Agda and the library `agda-categories`.

### Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

**Why do we need votes?**

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

## Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation**Look for similar papers (in beta version)**

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

**Disclaimer:** The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.