Cybersecurity of AI medical devices: risks, legislation, and challenges

AI-generated keywords: Cybersecurity Healthcare Medical Devices Artificial Intelligence (AI) Regulatory Framework

AI-generated Key Points

  • Cybersecurity and healthcare intersect in the context of medical devices and AI systems
  • These technologies have the potential to transform healthcare, but also pose significant risks to patient safety and security if exposed to cyberattacks
  • The chapter is divided into three parts:
  • Part one provides an overview of cybersecurity in healthcare and defines AI that is considered a medical device or supports one, with examples of risks posed by such devices
  • Part two examines the European Union's regulatory framework for ensuring cybersecurity of AI as or in medical devices, including relevant legislation such as MDR, NIS Directive, Cybersecurity Act, GDPR, AI Act proposal, and NIS 2 Directive proposal
  • Part three examines possible challenges stemming from this regulatory framework, including how the AI Act will interact with MDR regarding cybersecurity and safety requirements; interpretation of incident notification requirements from NIS 2 Directive proposal and MDR; and consequences arising from evolving definitions of critical infrastructures
  • Draws on a range of sources including academic articles and relevant books
  • Offers valuable insights into how cybersecurity concerns intersect with healthcare provisions involving medical devices and AI systems
  • Highlights key challenges facing regulators as they seek to ensure patient safety and security while fostering innovation within their respective jurisdictions.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Elisabetta Biasin, Erik Kamenjasevic, Kaspar Rosager Ludvigsen

License: CC BY 4.0

Abstract: Medical devices and artificial intelligence systems rapidly transform healthcare provisions. At the same time, due to their nature, AI in or as medical devices might get exposed to cyberattacks, leading to patient safety and security risks. This book chapter is divided into three parts. The first part starts by setting the scene where we explain the role of cybersecurity in healthcare. Then, we briefly define what we refer to when we talk about AI that is considered a medical device by itself or supports one. To illustrate the risks such medical devices pose, we provide three examples: the poisoning of datasets, social engineering, and data or source code extraction. In the second part, the paper provides an overview of the European Union's regulatory framework relevant for ensuring the cybersecurity of AI as or in medical devices (MDR, NIS Directive, Cybersecurity Act, GDPR, the AI Act proposal and the NIS 2 Directive proposal). Finally, the third part of the paper examines possible challenges stemming from the EU regulatory framework. In particular, we look toward the challenges deriving from the two legislative proposals and their interaction with the existing legislation concerning AI medical devices' cybersecurity. They are structured as answers to the following questions: (1) how will the AI Act interact with the MDR regarding the cybersecurity and safety requirements?; (2) how should we interpret incident notification requirements from the NIS 2 Directive proposal and MDR?; and (3) what are the consequences of the evolving term of critical infrastructures? [This is a draft chapter. The final version will be available in Research Handbook on Health, AI and the Law edited by Barry Solaiman & I. Glenn Cohen, forthcoming 2023, Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd]

Submitted to arXiv on 06 Mar. 2023

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2303.03140v1

This draft chapter explores the intersection of cybersecurity and healthcare in the context of medical devices and artificial intelligence (AI) systems. While these technologies have the potential to transform healthcare, they also pose significant risks to patient safety and security if exposed to cyberattacks. The chapter is divided into three parts. The first part provides an overview of cybersecurity in healthcare and defines what is meant by AI that is considered a medical device or supports one. The authors illustrate the risks posed by such devices through three examples: poisoning datasets, social engineering, and data or source code extraction. In the second part, the chapter examines the European Union's regulatory framework for ensuring the cybersecurity of AI as or in medical devices. This includes an overview of relevant legislation such as the Medical Devices Regulation (MDR), NIS Directive, Cybersecurity Act, General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), AI Act proposal, and NIS 2 Directive proposal. Finally, in the third part of the chapter, possible challenges stemming from this regulatory framework are examined. Specifically, the authors explore how the AI Act will interact with MDR regarding cybersecurity and safety requirements; how incident notification requirements from NIS 2 Directive proposal and MDR should be interpreted; and what consequences may arise from evolving definitions of critical infrastructures. The chapter draws on a range of sources including academic articles on topics such as adversarial attacks on camera-LiDAR models for car detection, phishing during COVID-19 pandemic, targeted attacks on teleoperated surgical robots, machine learning in image defogging techniques among others. It also cites relevant books like Security Engineering: A Guide to Building Dependable Distributed Systems by Ross Anderson and The Palgrave Handbook of International Cybercrime and Cyberdeviance edited by Thomas J Holt and Adam M Bossler. Overall, this draft chapter offers valuable insights into how cybersecurity concerns intersect with healthcare provisions involving medical devices and AI systems. It highlights key challenges facing regulators as they seek to ensure patient safety and security in an increasingly complex technological landscape while fostering innovation within their respective jurisdictions.
Created on 03 Jun. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.