Cybersecurity of AI medical devices: risks, legislation, and challenges
AI-generated Key Points
- Cybersecurity and healthcare intersect in the context of medical devices and AI systems
- These technologies have the potential to transform healthcare, but also pose significant risks to patient safety and security if exposed to cyberattacks
- The chapter is divided into three parts:
- Part one provides an overview of cybersecurity in healthcare and defines AI that is considered a medical device or supports one, with examples of risks posed by such devices
- Part two examines the European Union's regulatory framework for ensuring cybersecurity of AI as or in medical devices, including relevant legislation such as MDR, NIS Directive, Cybersecurity Act, GDPR, AI Act proposal, and NIS 2 Directive proposal
- Part three examines possible challenges stemming from this regulatory framework, including how the AI Act will interact with MDR regarding cybersecurity and safety requirements; interpretation of incident notification requirements from NIS 2 Directive proposal and MDR; and consequences arising from evolving definitions of critical infrastructures
- Draws on a range of sources including academic articles and relevant books
- Offers valuable insights into how cybersecurity concerns intersect with healthcare provisions involving medical devices and AI systems
- Highlights key challenges facing regulators as they seek to ensure patient safety and security while fostering innovation within their respective jurisdictions.
Authors: Elisabetta Biasin, Erik Kamenjasevic, Kaspar Rosager Ludvigsen
Abstract: Medical devices and artificial intelligence systems rapidly transform healthcare provisions. At the same time, due to their nature, AI in or as medical devices might get exposed to cyberattacks, leading to patient safety and security risks. This book chapter is divided into three parts. The first part starts by setting the scene where we explain the role of cybersecurity in healthcare. Then, we briefly define what we refer to when we talk about AI that is considered a medical device by itself or supports one. To illustrate the risks such medical devices pose, we provide three examples: the poisoning of datasets, social engineering, and data or source code extraction. In the second part, the paper provides an overview of the European Union's regulatory framework relevant for ensuring the cybersecurity of AI as or in medical devices (MDR, NIS Directive, Cybersecurity Act, GDPR, the AI Act proposal and the NIS 2 Directive proposal). Finally, the third part of the paper examines possible challenges stemming from the EU regulatory framework. In particular, we look toward the challenges deriving from the two legislative proposals and their interaction with the existing legislation concerning AI medical devices' cybersecurity. They are structured as answers to the following questions: (1) how will the AI Act interact with the MDR regarding the cybersecurity and safety requirements?; (2) how should we interpret incident notification requirements from the NIS 2 Directive proposal and MDR?; and (3) what are the consequences of the evolving term of critical infrastructures? [This is a draft chapter. The final version will be available in Research Handbook on Health, AI and the Law edited by Barry Solaiman & I. Glenn Cohen, forthcoming 2023, Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd]
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
Welcome to our AI assistant! Here are some important things to keep in mind:
- The assistant will only answer questions related to this specific paper.
- Please note that this is not a bot for casual chatting.
- If you want the answer in a language other than the language you chose for navigating the website, simply add "TRANSLATE IN LANGUAGE L" at the end of your query (replace "LANGUAGE L" with the language of your choice).
- For example, you could ask "Can you extract the most important aspect of the paper? TRANSLATE IN SPANISH".
- If you want to keep the history of your questions/answers you should create an account.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through atree representation
Look for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.