GEMAct: a Python package for non-life (re)insurance modeling
AI-generated Key Points
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.
- "GEMAct" is a Python package for actuarial modeling based on the collective risk model
- The library supports various applications such as costing and risk transfers, risks aggregation, and claims reserving
- New probability distributions have been added to those available in scipy, including the (a,b,0) and (a,b,1) discrete distributions as well as Archimedean and Elliptical classes of copulas
- GEMAct has a software implementation of the AEP algorithm which allows users to calculate cumulative distribution functions of dependent non-negative random variables given their dependency structure specified with a copula
- The theoretical framework underlying these actuarial models is introduced at the beginning of each section to provide readers with sufficient understanding.
- Overall, this paper presents an important contribution to actuarial modeling by providing a comprehensive library that supports various applications in non-life insurance modeling.
Authors: Gabriele Pittarello, Edoardo Luini, Manfred Marvin Marchione
Abstract: This paper introduces gemact, a Python package for actuarial modeling based on the collective risk model. The library supports applications to costing and risk transfers, risks aggregation, and claims reserving. We add new probability distributions to those available in scipy, including the (a,b,0) and (a,b,1) discrete distributions, the Archimedean and the Elliptical classes of copulas. We provide a software implementation of the AEP algorithm for calculating the cumulative distribution function of the sum of dependent, non-negative random variables, given their dependency structure specified with a copula. The theoretical framework is introduced in brief at the beginning of each section to provide the reader with a sufficient understanding of the underlying actuarial models.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Score: 0
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.
Look for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.