An Evaluation System for DeFi Lending Protocols

AI-generated keywords: DeFi Lending Protocols Evaluation Model Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) Total Locked Value (TVL)

AI-generated Key Points

  • Decentralized finance (DeFi) has led to the emergence of lending protocols in the market.
  • A comprehensive evaluation model is needed to assess the performance of these protocols.
  • Current evaluations are limited to single indicators such as total locked value (TVL).
  • The proposed four-layer evaluation model is based on Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP).
  • Scores for six mainstream lending protocols from August 2021 to November 2022 were calculated using on-chain and off-chain data obtained from Etherscan and Token Terminal.
  • The model comprises three first-level indicators and ten second-level indicators that cover various aspects of protocol performance.
  • The analysis reveals that the violent decline in ETH prices increases the market share of stablecoins in lending protocols.
  • Reasons for fluctuations in protocol scores are identified through comparative analysis of second-level indicators.
  • Evolution of protocol scores over time is discussed and compared with rankings based on different time granularities.
  • Future work aims to quantify risk factors associated with lending protocols and incorporate them into the evaluation model to provide participants in DeFi with an accurate reference point.
  • The proposed evaluation system provides a more comprehensive approach to assessing lending protocols beyond TVL alone, enabling investors to make informed decisions about their investments.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Shuai Yang, Wei Cui

License: CC BY 4.0

Abstract: With the development of decentralized finance (DeFi), lending protocols have been increasingly proposed in the market. A comprehensive and in-depth evaluation of lending protocol is essential to the DeFi market participants. Due to the short development time of DeFi, the current evaluation is limited to the single evaluation indicator, such as total locked value (TVL). To our knowledge, we are the first to study the evaluation model for DeFi lending protocol. In this paper, we build a four-layer lending protocol evaluation model based on Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). The model contains three first-level indicators and ten second-level indicators, covering various aspects of the performance of lending protocol. We calculated these indicators by obtaining on-chain and off-chain data of lending protocol. Then we evaluated and ranked six mainstream lending protocols utilizing the proposed model during the period 2021/8/20-2022/11/10. Through comparative analysis of evaluation result, we found that the violent decline in the price of ETH increase the market share of stablecoin in the lending protocols. In addition, we also revealed the reasons for various fluctuations.

Submitted to arXiv on 02 Mar. 2023

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2303.01022v1

Decentralized finance (DeFi) has brought about the emergence of lending protocols in the market. To assess the performance of these protocols, there is a need for a comprehensive evaluation model. Currently, evaluations are limited to single indicators such as total locked value (TVL). This paper proposes a four-layer evaluation model based on Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and calculates scores for six mainstream lending protocols from August 2021 to November 2022 using on-chain and off-chain data obtained from Etherscan and Token Terminal. The model comprises three first-level indicators and ten second-level indicators that cover various aspects of protocol performance. Our analysis reveals that the violent decline in ETH prices increases the market share of stablecoins in lending protocols. We also identify reasons for fluctuations in protocol scores through comparative analysis of second-level indicators. Additionally, we discuss the evolution of protocol scores over time and compare it with rankings based on different time granularities. In future work, we aim to quantify risk factors associated with lending protocols and incorporate them into our evaluation model to provide participants in DeFi with an accurate reference point. Our proposed evaluation system provides a more comprehensive approach to assessing lending protocols beyond TVL alone, enabling investors to make informed decisions about their investments.
Created on 07 Apr. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.