Of Degens and Defrauders: Using Open-Source Investigative Tools to Investigate Decentralized Finance Frauds and Money Laundering

AI-generated keywords: DeFi Fraud Money Laundering Open-Source Tools Ethereum

AI-generated Key Points

  • Decentralized finance (DeFi) ecosystem experiences an increase in fraud, resulting in billions of dollars lost to DeFi scams every year.
  • A team of researchers used open-source investigative tools to investigate potential frauds involving Ethereum tokens extracted from the blockchain and analyze how proceeds from these scams were laundered.
  • The analysis enabled them to identify a set of tokens meriting further investigation and uncover transaction-based evidence of several rug pull and pump-and-dump schemes while identifying their perpetrators' money laundering tactics and cash-out methods.
  • Rug pulls were less sophisticated than anticipated, with rudimentary money laundering techniques employed by the perpetrators.
  • Many funds ended up at centralized exchanges, indicating a lack of sophistication in the laundering process.
  • Open-source investigative tools can extract transaction-based evidence that could be used in court to prosecute DeFi frauds.
  • Future research could analyze patterns of behavior among Ethereum addresses participating in the purchase of DeFi tokens exhibiting similar behavior to those analyzed in this study.
  • Exploring ways to automate more of the investigation process, such as automatically applying heuristics identified during the money laundering investigation phase, is suggested.
  • Investigating on-chain data using open-source tools can provide valuable insights into fraudulent activities within DeFi ecosystems.
  • With continued research efforts focused on refining these investigative techniques, it may be possible to reduce losses due to DeFi scams significantly.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Arianna Trozze, Toby Davies, Bennett Kleinberg

License: CC BY-NC-SA 4.0

Abstract: Fraud across the decentralized finance (DeFi) ecosystem is growing, with victims losing billions to DeFi scams every year. However, there is a disconnect between the reported value of these scams and associated legal prosecutions. We use open-source investigative tools to (1) triage Ethereum tokens extracted from the Ethereum blockchain for further investigation, (2) investigate potential frauds involving these tokens using on-chain data and token smart contract analysis, and (3) investigate the ways proceeds from these scams were subsequently laundered. The analysis enabled us to (1) identify a set of tokens meriting further investigation, (2) uncover transaction-based evidence of several rug pull and pump-and-dump schemes, and (3) identify their perpetrators' money laundering tactics and cash-out methods. The rug pulls were less sophisticated than anticipated, money laundering techniques were also rudimentary and many funds ended up at centralized exchanges. This study demonstrates how open-source investigative tools can extract transaction-based evidence that could be used in a court of law to prosecute DeFi frauds. Additionally, we investigate how these funds are subsequently laundered.

Submitted to arXiv on 01 Mar. 2023

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2303.00810v1

The decentralized finance (DeFi) ecosystem has been experiencing an increase in fraud, resulting in billions of dollars lost to DeFi scams every year. To address this issue, a team of researchers used open-source investigative tools to investigate potential frauds involving Ethereum tokens extracted from the blockchain and analyze how proceeds from these scams were laundered. The analysis enabled them to identify a set of tokens meriting further investigation and uncover transaction-based evidence of several rug pull and pump-and-dump schemes while identifying their perpetrators' money laundering tactics and cash-out methods. The study found that the rug pulls were less sophisticated than anticipated, with rudimentary money laundering techniques employed by the perpetrators. Many funds ended up at centralized exchanges, indicating a lack of sophistication in the laundering process. The research demonstrates how open-source investigative tools can extract transaction-based evidence that could be used in court to prosecute DeFi frauds. The authors note that future research could analyze patterns of behavior among Ethereum addresses participating in the purchase of DeFi tokens exhibiting similar behavior to those analyzed in this study. They suggest exploring ways to automate more of the investigation process, such as automatically applying heuristics identified during the money laundering investigation phase. While limitations exist regarding token extraction processes and running full Ethereum nodes, this study highlights how investigating on-chain data using open-source tools can provide valuable insights into fraudulent activities within DeFi ecosystems. With continued research efforts focused on refining these investigative techniques, it may be possible to reduce losses due to DeFi scams significantly.
Created on 11 Apr. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.