The TESS Triple-9 Catalog II: a new set of 999 uniformly-vetted exoplanet candidates

AI-generated keywords: TESS Exoplanet Citizen Science DAVE Pipeline Automatic Disposition Generator

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • The Transiting Exoplanet Survey Satellite (TESS) mission has been providing millions of light curves of stars across the entire sky since 2018.
  • Thousands of planet candidates have been detected by TESS that require careful examination before being considered for follow-up programs.
  • The Plant Patrol citizen science project has produced a second catalog containing 999 uniformly-vetted exoplanet candidates within the TESS ExoFOP archive.
  • The catalog was created by leveraging the power of Citizen Science Planet Patrol and vetting TESS Objects of Interest (TOIs) based on the results from Discovery And Vetting of Exoplanets (DAVE) pipeline.
  • An Automatic Disposition Generator was employed to generate final classifications for each TOI that had been vetted by at least three individuals.
  • Of all candidates in the catalog, 752 TOIs passed through rigorous vetting and were labeled as planet candidates; 142 were ruled out as false positives and 105 were flagged as potential false positives.
  • The final dispositions and comments for all planet candidates are publicly available in a supplementary table.
  • This new catalog provides a comprehensive and reliable list of exoplanet candidates that can be used for future follow-up programs.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Christian Magliano, Veselin Kostov, Luca Cacciapuoti, Giovanni Covone, Laura Inno, Stefano Fiscale, Marc Kuchner, Elisa V. Quintana, Ryan Salik, Vito Saggese, John M. Yablonsky, Aline U. Fornear, Michiharu Hyogo, Marco Z. Di Fraia, Hugo A. Durantini Luca, Julien S. de Lambilly, Fabrizio Oliva, Isabella Pagano, Riccardo M. Ienco, Lucas T. de Lima, Marc Andrés-Carcasona, Francesco Gallo, Sovan Acharya

arXiv: 2303.00624v1 - DOI (astro-ph.EP)
17 pages, 11 figures, 5 tables. Accepted for publication on MNRAS

Abstract: The Transiting Exoplanet Survey Satellite (TESS) mission is providing the scientific community with millions of light curves of stars spread across the whole sky. Since 2018 the telescope has detected thousands of planet candidates that need to be meticulously scrutinized before being considered amenable targets for follow-up programs. We present the second catalog of the Plant Patrol citizen science project containing 999 uniformly-vetted exoplanet candidates within the TESS ExoFOP archive. The catalog was produced by fully exploiting the power of the Citizen Science Planet Patrol project. We vetted TESS Objects of Interest (TOIs) based on the results of Discovery And Vetting of Exoplanets DAVE pipeline. We also implemented the Automatic Disposition Generator, a custom procedure aimed at generating the final classification for each TOI that was vetted by at least three vetters. The majority of the candidates in our catalog, $752$ TOIs, passed the vetting process and were labelled as planet candidates. We ruled out $142$ candidates as false positives and flagged $105$ as potential false positives. Our final dispositions and comments for all the planet candidates are provided as a publicly available supplementary table.

Submitted to arXiv on 01 Mar. 2023

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2303.00624v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

The Transiting Exoplanet Survey Satellite (TESS) mission has been providing the scientific community with millions of light curves of stars across the entire sky since 2018. Among these light curves, thousands of planet candidates have been detected by TESS that require careful examination before being considered for follow-up programs. To address this issue, the Plant Patrol citizen science project has produced a second catalog containing 999 uniformly-vetted exoplanet candidates within the TESS ExoFOP archive. The catalog was created by leveraging the power of Citizen Science Planet Patrol and vetting TESS Objects of Interest (TOIs) based on the results from Discovery And Vetting of Exoplanets (DAVE) pipeline. Additionally, an Automatic Disposition Generator was employed to generate final classifications for each TOI that had been vetted by at least three individuals. Of all candidates in the catalog, 752 TOIs passed through rigorous vetting and were labeled as planet candidates; 142 were ruled out as false positives and 105 were flagged as potential false positives. The final dispositions and comments for all planet candidates are publicly available in a supplementary table. This new catalog provides a comprehensive and reliable list of exoplanet candidates that can be used for future follow-up programs. It was authored by Christian Magliano, Veselin Kostov, Luca Cacciapuoti, Giovanni Covone, Laura Inno, Stefano Fiscale, Marc Kuchner, Elisa V. Quintana, Ryan Salik ,Vito Saggese ,John M Yablonsky ,Aline U Fornear ,Michiharu Hyogo ,Marc Z Di Fraia ,Hugo A Durantini Luca ,Julien S de Lambilly ,Fabrizio Oliva ,Isabella Pagano ,Riccardo M Ienco ,Lucas T de Lima ,Marc Andrés Carcasona ,Francesco Gallo and Sovan Acharya.
Created on 06 Apr. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.