A multi-cell experimental design to recover policy relevant treatment effects, with an application to online advertising

AI-generated keywords: Causal Inference Advertising Decisions Experimental Design Marginal Treatment Effects Real-time Bidding

AI-generated Key Points

  • The paper proposes an experimental design that leverages modern estimation techniques when only eligibility to receive treatment can be randomized.
  • This design is tailored to exploit these methods and recover enough information to solve problems with an intensive margin.
  • The paper fills the gap in the literature by embedding a causal inference setup in an advertiser's optimization problem, enabling them to choose the intensive margin of how many consumers to reach with advertising.
  • It connects causal inference with advertising decisions and provides a framework for recovering treatment effect parameters that account for parallel experimentation by competitors.
  • The paper introduces a specific decision problem faced by firms - choosing the fraction of consumers from a target segment to reach with advertising to maximize expected profit.
  • The proposed approach outperforms standard techniques in recovering treatment effect parameters and generates better decisions relative to standard techniques through a simple advertising reach decision problem.
  • The paper discusses practical issues in implementing this design and highlights its limitations in accounting for other experimentation costs relevant in real-time bidding settings.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Caio Waisman, Brett R. Gordon

License: CC BY 4.0

Abstract: Experiments are an important tool to measure the impacts of interventions. However, in experimental settings with one-sided noncompliance, extant empirical approaches may not produce the estimates a decision-maker needs to solve their problem. For example, these experimental designs are common in digital advertising settings, but they are uninformative of decisions regarding the intensive margin -- how much should be spent or how many consumers should be reached with a campaign. We propose a solution that combines a novel multi-cell experimental design with modern estimation techniques that enables decision-makers to recover enough information to solve problems with an intensive margin. Our design is straightforward to implement. Using data from advertising experiments at Facebook, we demonstrate that our approach outperforms standard techniques in recovering treatment effect parameters. Through a simple advertising reach decision problem, we show that our approach generates better decisions relative to standard techniques.

Submitted to arXiv on 27 Feb. 2023

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2302.13857v1

The paper makes three contributions to the literature. Firstly, it proposes an experimental design that leverages modern estimation techniques when only eligibility to receive treatment can be randomized. This design is tailored to exploit these methods and recover enough information to solve problems with an intensive margin. Secondly, the paper fills the gap in the literature by embedding a causal inference setup in an advertiser's optimization problem, enabling them to choose the intensive margin of how many consumers to reach with advertising. Thirdly, it connects causal inference with advertising decisions and provides a framework for recovering treatment effect parameters that account for parallel experimentation by competitors. The paper introduces a specific decision problem faced by firms - choosing the fraction of consumers from a target segment to reach with advertising to maximize expected profit. The typical experimental design with one-sided noncompliance does not provide enough information needed to solve this problem as it only produces estimates of intent-to-treat or average treatment effects. To address this issue, the paper proposes a novel multi-cell experimental design combined with modern estimation techniques that enable decision-makers to recover an approximation of marginal treatment effects (MTE) function. Using data from Facebook advertising experiments, the proposed approach outperforms standard techniques in recovering treatment effect parameters and generates better decisions relative to standard techniques through a simple advertising reach decision problem. The paper also discusses practical issues in implementing this design and highlights its limitations in accounting for other experimentation costs relevant in real-time bidding settings. Overall, this paper contributes significantly to estimating treatment effects in experiments with one-sided noncompliance and provides insights into solving complex advertising decision problems using causal inference frameworks.
Created on 10 Apr. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.