Temporally distributed parent body accretion in the C reservoir of the solar system
Authors: Wladimir Neumann, Ning Ma, Audrey Bouvier, Mario Trieloff
Abstract: Accretion processes in protoplanetary disks produce a diversity of small bodies that played a crucial role in multiple reshuffling events throughout the solar system and in both early and late accretion of planets. Application of thermo-chronometers to meteorites provides precise dating of the formation age of mineralogical components. Nucleosynthetic anomalies indicating a dichotomy between NC and C meteorites and precise parent body (PB) chronology can be combined with thermal evolution models to constrain the timescale of accretion and dynamical processes in the early solar system. Achondrite PBs are considered to have accreted early and mostly in the NC region, while late accretion in the C region produced mostly undifferentiated PBs, such as the CR chondrite PB that formed as late as 4 Ma after CAIs. However, presence of more evolved CR-related meteorites suggests also an earlier accretion timing. We present modeling evidence for a temporally distributed accretion of parent bodies of CR-related meteorite groups that originate from a C reservoir and range from aqueously altered chondrites to partially differentiated primitive achondrites. The PB formation times derived range from <1 Ma to ~4 Ma after solar system formation, with ~3.7 Ma, ~1.5-2.75 Ma, <~0.6 Ma, and <~0.7 Ma for CR, Flensburg, NWA 6704, and NWA 011. This implies that accretion processes in the C reservoir started as early as in the NC reservoir and produced differentiated PBs with carbonaceous compositions in addition to undifferentiated C chondritic PBs. The accretion times correlate inversely with the degree of the meteorites' alteration, metamorphism, or differentiation. Accretion times for CI/CM, Ryugu, and Tafassites PBs of ~3.75 Ma, ~1-3 Ma, and 1.1 Ma, respectively, fit well into this correlation in agreement with the thermal and alteration conditions suggested by the meteorites.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
Some bits of the article are not summarized yet, you can re-run the summarizing process by clicking on the Run button below.
⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.
Look for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.