## Mode Mixing and Rotational Splittings: II. Reconciling Different Approaches to Mode Coupling

### AI-generated Key Points

- The paper focuses on the coupling between p- and g-mode cavities in mixed-mode asteroseismology of subgiants and red giants.
- Understanding this coupling is crucial for deriving localized estimates of interior rotation from measurements of mode multiplet rotational splittings.
- The authors examine the analytic properties of both descriptions and derive closed-form expressions for various quantities that previously had to be solved numerically.
- Using these closed-form expressions, the authors reconcile both formulations for the first time, deriving relations by which quantities in each formulation may be translated to and interpreted within the other.
- This yields an information criterion for whether a given configuration of mixed modes meaningfully constrains the parameters of the asymptotic construction, which is likely not satisfied by the majority of first-ascent red giant stars in their observational sample.
- The authors also examine how such limitations affect existing measurements through a hare-and-hounds exercise.
- They find that while averaged estimates of core rotation seem fairly robust, template-matching using the asymptotic construction has difficulty reliably assigning rotational splittings to individual multiplets or estimating mixing fractions $\zeta$ of the most p-dominated mixed modes where such estimates are most needed.
- Finally, this paper discusses implications for extending the two-zone model of radial differential rotation via rotational inversions with these methods.
- The closed-form nature of the asymptotic parameterization makes it far easier to operationalize and computationally less expensive than matrix decompositions employed in algebraic approaches; numerical solutions to its eigenvalue problem are not required either.
- Overall, this study provides a comprehensive analysis and reconciliation between two different descriptions used in mixed-mode asteroseismology while highlighting their limitations when applied to observational data.

**Authors:**
J. M. Joel Ong,
Charlotte Gehan

**Abstract:** In the mixed-mode asteroseismology of subgiants and red giants, the coupling between the p- and g-mode cavities must be understood well in order to derive localised estimates of interior rotation from measurements of mode multiplet rotational splittings. There exist now two different descriptions of this coupling: one based on an asymptotic quantisation condition, and the other arising from coupling matrices associated with "acoustic molecular orbitals". We examine the analytic properties of both, and derive closed-form expressions for various quantities -- such as the period-stretching function $\tau$ -- which previously had to be solved for numerically. Using these, we reconcile both formulations for the first time, deriving relations by which quantities in each formulation may be translated to and interpreted within the other. This yields an information criterion for whether a given configuration of mixed modes meaningfully constrains the parameters of the asymptotic construction, which is likely not satisfied by the majority of first-ascent red giant stars in our observational sample. Since this construction has been already used to make rotational measurements of such red giants, we examine -- through a hare-and-hounds exercise -- whether, and how, such limitations affect existing measurements. While averaged estimates of core rotation seem fairly robust, template-matching using the asymptotic construction has difficulty reliably assigning rotational splittings to individual multiplets, or estimating mixing fractions $\zeta$ of the most p-dominated mixed modes, where such estimates are most needed. We finally discuss implications for extending the two-zone model of radial differential rotation, e.g. via rotational inversions, with these methods.

### Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

**Why do we need votes?**

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

## Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation**Look for similar papers (in beta version)**

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

**Disclaimer:** The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.