On Penalty-based Bilevel Gradient Descent Method

AI-generated keywords: Bilevel Optimization Penalty Method PBGD Algorithm Finite-Time Convergence Non-Strongly Convex

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Bilevel optimization is valuable in hyper-parameter optimization, meta-learning, and reinforcement learning
  • Existing scalable algorithms focus on strongly convex or unconstrained lower-level objectives
  • The authors propose a penalty-based approach to solve bilevel problems
  • They introduce the penalty-based bilevel gradient descent (PBGD) algorithm
  • PBGD has finite-time convergence for constrained bilevel problems without lower-level strong convexity
  • Experiments validate the effectiveness of their approach in solving bilevel optimization problems with constraints and non-strongly convex lower-level objectives
  • This research contributes to advancing scalable algorithms for difficult bilevel optimization problems with potential practical applications in various domains.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Han Shen, Quan Xiao, Tianyi Chen

Improved Section 4 by removing a critical assumption; Added Section 5 and citations

Abstract: Bilevel optimization enjoys a wide range of applications in hyper-parameter optimization, meta-learning and reinforcement learning. However, bilevel optimization problems are difficult to solve. Recent progress on scalable bilevel algorithms mainly focuses on bilevel optimization problems where the lower-level objective is either strongly convex or unconstrained. In this work, we tackle the bilevel problem through the lens of the penalty method. We show that under certain conditions, the penalty reformulation recovers the solutions of the original bilevel problem. Further, we propose the penalty-based bilevel gradient descent (PBGD) algorithm and establish its finite-time convergence for the constrained bilevel problem without lower-level strong convexity. Experiments showcase the efficiency of the proposed PBGD algorithm.

Submitted to arXiv on 10 Feb. 2023

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2302.05185v4

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

Bilevel optimization is a valuable tool in various fields such as hyper-parameter optimization, meta-learning, and reinforcement learning. Solving bilevel optimization problems is challenging; existing scalable algorithms mainly focus on cases where the lower-level objective is strongly convex or unconstrained. In this study, the authors approach the bilevel problem using the penalty method. They demonstrate that under certain conditions, the penalty reformulation can recover solutions of the original bilevel problem and propose a new algorithm called penalty-based bilevel gradient descent (PBGD). They establish its finite-time convergence for constrained bilevel problems without lower-level strong convexity. Experiments validate their approach and indicate that their method effectively solves bilevel optimization problems even when faced with constraints and non-strongly convex lower-level objectives. This research contributes to advancing scalable algorithms for solving difficult bilevel optimization problems by offering a promising approach to tackle these challenges with potential for practical applications in various domains.
Created on 28 Dec. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.