Bilevel Optimization for Machine Learning: Algorithm Design and Convergence Analysis
AI-generated Key Points
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.
- Bilevel optimization is a powerful framework in machine learning
- Two main classes of bilevel optimization: problem-based and algorithm-based
- Problem-based bilevel optimization involves finding a minimizer for a given loss function
- Popular gradient-based algorithms for problem-based bilevel optimization: approximate implicit differentiation (AID) and iterative differentiation (ITD)
- Comprehensive convergence rate analysis for AID- and ITD-based bilevel algorithms
- Proposes principled algorithm designs to enhance efficiency and scalability in bilevel optimization tasks
- Introduction of acceleration bilevel algorithms with sharper convergence analysis under relaxed assumptions
- Establishment of lower bounds for bilevel optimization and demonstration of optimality through matching upper bounds under certain conditions
- Proposal of new stochastic bilevel optimization algorithms with lower complexity and higher efficiency in practical settings
- Algorithm-based bilevel optimization involves an inner-level solution generated by fixed algorithms such as model-agnostic meta-learning (MAML) or almost no inner loop (ANIL)
- Limited understanding regarding the convergence properties of algorithm-based bilevel optimization approaches
- Development of theoretical convergence results for general multi-step MAML and ANIL approaches, considering parameter selections and loss geometries impact their complexities
- Contributes to the field of machine learning by providing detailed convergence rate analysis for both problem-based and algorithm-based bilevel optimization formulations
- Novel algorithm designs improve efficiency and scalability in these tasks
- Findings pave the way for further advancements in optimizing machine learning models using bilevel techniques.
Authors: Kaiyi Ji
Abstract: Bilevel optimization has become a powerful framework in various machine learning applications including meta-learning, hyperparameter optimization, and network architecture search. There are generally two classes of bilevel optimization formulations for machine learning: 1) problem-based bilevel optimization, whose inner-level problem is formulated as finding a minimizer of a given loss function; and 2) algorithm-based bilevel optimization, whose inner-level solution is an output of a fixed algorithm. For the first class, two popular types of gradient-based algorithms have been proposed for hypergradient estimation via approximate implicit differentiation (AID) and iterative differentiation (ITD). Algorithms for the second class include the popular model-agnostic meta-learning (MAML) and almost no inner loop (ANIL). However, the convergence rate and fundamental limitations of bilevel optimization algorithms have not been well explored. This thesis provides a comprehensive convergence rate analysis for bilevel algorithms in the aforementioned two classes. We further propose principled algorithm designs for bilevel optimization with higher efficiency and scalability. For the problem-based formulation, we provide a convergence rate analysis for AID- and ITD-based bilevel algorithms. We then develop acceleration bilevel algorithms, for which we provide shaper convergence analysis with relaxed assumptions. We also provide the first lower bounds for bilevel optimization, and establish the optimality by providing matching upper bounds under certain conditions. We finally propose new stochastic bilevel optimization algorithms with lower complexity and higher efficiency in practice. For the algorithm-based formulation, we develop a theoretical convergence for general multi-step MAML and ANIL, and characterize the impact of parameter selections and loss geometries on the their complexities.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Score: 0
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.