Feature-based SpMV Performance Analysis on Contemporary Devices

AI-generated keywords: SpMV Performance Analysis HPC Platforms Structural Features Memory Bandwidth

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • SpMV kernel is a critical component in high-performance computing
  • Performance variation depends on input matrix and computing platform
  • GPUs were previously state-of-the-art for SpMV, but recent advancements in multicore CPUs and low-power FPGA accelerators have prompted a reevaluation of their performance and energy efficiency
  • Authors present a high-level SpMV performance analysis based on structural features of matrices related to common bottlenecks such as memory-bandwidth intensity, low ILP, load imbalance, and memory latency overheads
  • Analysis conducted using an extensive artificial matrix dataset across nine modern HPC platforms: five CPUs, three GPUs, and an FPGA
  • Multicore CPUs can outperform GPUs for certain types of matrices with more balanced characteristics
  • Low-power FPGAs show promise as an energy-efficient alternative to both GPUs and CPUs for certain types of matrices with specific structural features
  • Paper provides valuable insights into how different structural features impact SpMV performance across various computing platforms which can inform future developments in hardware design and optimization strategies for SpMV kernels in high-performance computing applications.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Panagiotis Mpakos, Dimitrios Galanopoulos, Petros Anastasiadis, Nikela Papadopoulou, Nectarios Koziris, Georgios Goumas

to appear at IPDPS'23

Abstract: The SpMV kernel is characterized by high performance variation per input matrix and computing platform. While GPUs were considered State-of-the-Art for SpMV, with the emergence of advanced multicore CPUs and low-power FPGA accelerators, we need to revisit its performance and energy efficiency. This paper provides a high-level SpMV performance analysis based on structural features of matrices related to common bottlenecks of memory-bandwidth intensity, low ILP, load imbalance and memory latency overheads. Towards this, we create a wide artificial matrix dataset that spans these features and study the performance of different storage formats in nine modern HPC platforms; five CPUs, three GPUs and an FPGA. After validating our proposed methodology using real-world matrices, we analyze our extensive experimental results and draw key insights on the competitiveness of different target architectures for SpMV and the impact of each feature/bottleneck on its performance.

Submitted to arXiv on 08 Feb. 2023

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2302.04225v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

In the field of high-performance computing, the SpMV kernel is a critical component that exhibits significant performance variation depending on the input matrix and computing platform. While GPUs were previously considered state-of-the-art for SpMV, recent advancements in multicore CPUs and low-power FPGA accelerators have prompted a reevaluation of their performance and energy efficiency. In this paper, authors Panagiotis Mpakos, Dimitrios Galanopoulos, Petros Anastasiadis, Nikela Papadopoulou, Nectarios Koziris, and Georgios Goumas present a high-level SpMV performance analysis based on structural features of matrices related to common bottlenecks such as memory-bandwidth intensity, low ILP (instruction-level parallelism), load imbalance, and memory latency overheads. To conduct their analysis, the authors created an extensive artificial matrix dataset that spans these features and studied the performance of different storage formats across nine modern HPC platforms: five CPUs, three GPUs, and an FPGA. After validating their methodology using real-world matrices to ensure accuracy of results obtained from the artificial dataset they analyzed their experimental results to draw key insights on the competitiveness of different target architectures for SpMV and the impact of each feature/bottleneck on its performance. The findings suggest that while GPUs still offer competitive performance for certain types of matrices with high memory bandwidth requirements or low ILP characteristics, multicore CPUs can outperform them for other types of matrices with more balanced characteristics. Additionally, low-power FPGAs show promise as an energy-efficient alternative to both GPUs and CPUs for certain types of matrices with specific structural features. Overall, this paper provides valuable insights into how different structural features impact SpMV performance across various computing platforms which can inform future developments in hardware design and optimization strategies for SpMV kernels in high-performance computing applications.
Created on 18 Apr. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 1

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.